<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0" xmlns:fireside="https://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>feed01.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 12:29:24 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>The It's Innate! Podcast</title>
    <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm</link>
    <atom:link href="https://feeds.fireside.fm/itsinnate/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <atom:link href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" rel="hub"/>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 13:27:58 -0400</pubDate>
    <description>Two opinionated developmental cognitive scientists wax theoretical about how infants and children acquire knowledge!
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>© 2026 The It's Innate! Podcast</copyright>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>A podcast by two developmental cognitive scientists</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>Two opinionated developmental cognitive scientists wax theoretical about how infants and children acquire knowledge!
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
    <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
    <podcast:podping usesPodping="true"/>
<itunes:category text="Education"/>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
  <itunes:category text="Philosophy"/>
</itunes:category>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 36: The goldilocks of predicability (with Viridiana Benitez)</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/36</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3d678e91-6c20-4fd5-92be-bba28ee71464</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 08:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/3d678e91-6c20-4fd5-92be-bba28ee71464.mp3" length="83399300" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:39:44</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we had the pleasure of chatting with Dr. Viridiana Benitez, an Assistant Professor of Psychology at Arizona State University. In the first part of the episode we talked with Dr. Benitez about her academic journey along with how she approaches mentorship. In part two, we turned to her recent paper in Current Biology entitled &quot;Predictable Events Enhance Word Learning in Toddlers.&quot; This paper explores how environmental predictability can scaffold novel word learning in toddlers. Towards the end, we discuss the relationship between Dr. Benitez&#39;s work in predictability and her work in bilingualism. </p><p>Special Guest: Viridiana Benitez.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we had the pleasure of chatting with Dr. Viridiana Benitez, an Assistant Professor of Psychology at Arizona State University. In the first part of the episode we talked with Dr. Benitez about her academic journey along with how she approaches mentorship. In part two, we turned to her recent paper in Current Biology entitled &quot;Predictable Events Enhance Word Learning in Toddlers.&quot; This paper explores how environmental predictability can scaffold novel word learning in toddlers. Towards the end, we discuss the relationship between Dr. Benitez&#39;s work in predictability and her work in bilingualism. </p><p>Special Guest: Viridiana Benitez.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>This week we had the pleasure of chatting with Dr. Viridiana Benitez, an Assistant Professor of Psychology at Arizona State University. In the first part of the episode we talked with Dr. Benitez about her academic journey along with how she approaches mentorship. In part two, we turned to her recent paper in Current Biology entitled &quot;Predictable Events Enhance Word Learning in Toddlers.&quot; This paper explores how environmental predictability can scaffold novel word learning in toddlers. Towards the end, we discuss the relationship between Dr. Benitez&#39;s work in predictability and her work in bilingualism. </p><p>Special Guest: Viridiana Benitez.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+BVUsLara</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+BVUsLara" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="" role="guest">Viridiana Benitez</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 35: A 𝗰𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 take on the cognitive sciences (with Richard Prather)</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/35</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5941e50b-e141-4959-8177-3a3c2c0ec746</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 13:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/5941e50b-e141-4959-8177-3a3c2c0ec746.mp3" length="87646965" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:45:27</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we were joined by Dr. Richard Prather, an associate professor in the human development department at the University of Maryland, College Park. In the first segment, we talk about Richard&#39;s academic journey, his approach to applying to college and then to graduate school, and how he landed on one of his major research topics -- numerical development. We also talk a bit about computational modeling at the end of this segment. </p>

<p>In the second segment, we talk about how the cognitive sciences would benefit from adopting a more critical approach, what even is meant by &quot;critical&quot;, how he&#39;d respond to various potential critiques of the approach, whether this framework is feasible for junior scientists, and how he&#39;s applied it in his own work.</p>

<p>Links<br>
Prather, R. W. (2023). A new path: Why we need critical approaches to cognitive and psychological sciences. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 12(2), 195–198. <a href="https://www.pratherlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/anewpathpreprint.pdf" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Richard Prather.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>critical psychology, cognitive sciences, number development, number cognition, critical approaches</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we were joined by Dr. Richard Prather, an associate professor in the human development department at the University of Maryland, College Park. In the first segment, we talk about Richard&#39;s academic journey, his approach to applying to college and then to graduate school, and how he landed on one of his major research topics -- numerical development. We also talk a bit about computational modeling at the end of this segment. </p>

<p>In the second segment, we talk about how the cognitive sciences would benefit from adopting a more critical approach, what even is meant by &quot;critical&quot;, how he&#39;d respond to various potential critiques of the approach, whether this framework is feasible for junior scientists, and how he&#39;s applied it in his own work.</p>

<p>Links<br>
Prather, R. W. (2023). A new path: Why we need critical approaches to cognitive and psychological sciences. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 12(2), 195–198. <a href="https://www.pratherlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/anewpathpreprint.pdf" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Richard Prather.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we were joined by Dr. Richard Prather, an associate professor in the human development department at the University of Maryland, College Park. In the first segment, we talk about Richard&#39;s academic journey, his approach to applying to college and then to graduate school, and how he landed on one of his major research topics -- numerical development. We also talk a bit about computational modeling at the end of this segment. </p>

<p>In the second segment, we talk about how the cognitive sciences would benefit from adopting a more critical approach, what even is meant by &quot;critical&quot;, how he&#39;d respond to various potential critiques of the approach, whether this framework is feasible for junior scientists, and how he&#39;s applied it in his own work.</p>

<p>Links<br>
Prather, R. W. (2023). A new path: Why we need critical approaches to cognitive and psychological sciences. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 12(2), 195–198. <a href="https://www.pratherlab.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/anewpathpreprint.pdf" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Richard Prather.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+TGds2tOu</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+TGds2tOu" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="" role="host">Jenna DiStefano</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="" role="guest">Richard Prather</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 34: "There are only so many experiments one can do!"</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/34</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f6019dea-212c-4427-9add-58d8c917f4ca</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 21:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/f6019dea-212c-4427-9add-58d8c917f4ca.mp3" length="44205021" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:42:37</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This was a special episode because, unlike most other episodes in which Jenny and Deon talk with other people about their work and scientific journeys, Jenny and Deon talked about their own work. In the first half, they discuss Jenny’s recent Developmental Science paper showing that children’s estimates of the number of dots in an array can be influenced by the gender of the person providing the estimate. They talk about the study, the surprising findings, and what they might mean for how social stereotypes shape children’s learning. In the second half, they talk about a paper that Deon published in the Journal of Experimental Child Psychology that examined whether children can use a process called second-order correlation learning to make causal inferences in a task with multiple objects. </p>

<p>Link to Jenny&#39;s paper: <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/desc.70124" rel="nofollow">https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/desc.70124</a></p>

<p>Link to Deon&#39;s paper: <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096526000469" rel="nofollow">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096526000469</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>numerical cognition, causal inference, development</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This was a special episode because, unlike most other episodes in which Jenny and Deon talk with other people about their work and scientific journeys, Jenny and Deon talked about their own work. In the first half, they discuss Jenny’s recent Developmental Science paper showing that children’s estimates of the number of dots in an array can be influenced by the gender of the person providing the estimate. They talk about the study, the surprising findings, and what they might mean for how social stereotypes shape children’s learning. In the second half, they talk about a paper that Deon published in the Journal of Experimental Child Psychology that examined whether children can use a process called second-order correlation learning to make causal inferences in a task with multiple objects. </p>

<p>Link to Jenny&#39;s paper: <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/desc.70124" rel="nofollow">https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/desc.70124</a></p>

<p>Link to Deon&#39;s paper: <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096526000469" rel="nofollow">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096526000469</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>This was a special episode because, unlike most other episodes in which Jenny and Deon talk with other people about their work and scientific journeys, Jenny and Deon talked about their own work. In the first half, they discuss Jenny’s recent Developmental Science paper showing that children’s estimates of the number of dots in an array can be influenced by the gender of the person providing the estimate. They talk about the study, the surprising findings, and what they might mean for how social stereotypes shape children’s learning. In the second half, they talk about a paper that Deon published in the Journal of Experimental Child Psychology that examined whether children can use a process called second-order correlation learning to make causal inferences in a task with multiple objects. </p>

<p>Link to Jenny&#39;s paper: <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/desc.70124" rel="nofollow">https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/desc.70124</a></p>

<p>Link to Deon&#39;s paper: <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096526000469" rel="nofollow">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096526000469</a></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+YBxFpcRi</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+YBxFpcRi" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 33: Finding common ground (with Jenna DiStefano)</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/33</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ee4081b2-d0ab-4531-9738-d6b316302a05</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 14:15:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/ee4081b2-d0ab-4531-9738-d6b316302a05.mp3" length="79726725" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:30:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode we introduce our new podcast editor Jenna DiStefano, a developmental psychology PhD student at UC Davis. During the first segement, we chat with Jenna about her research path, decision to apply to graduate school, and where her work is heading. </p>

<p>In the second segement, we discuss Jenna&#39;s paper exploring contextual differences in infant-directed speech (IDS). Her paper analyzes how parents may talk differently to their infants depending on the context at-hand. We speculate about what makes IDS &quot;special&quot; and its role in language development -- is it the lack of &quot;common ground&quot; between a parent and infant? Is it emotion? Something else?  </p>

<p>Links<br>
DiStefano, J., Cohn, M., Zellou, G., &amp; Estes, K. G. (2025). Prosodic variation between contexts in infant-directed speech. Journal of Child Language, 1-23. <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-child-language/article/prosodic-variation-between-contexts-in-infantdirected-speech/2CAC2E419E9090FAABCCBBF3EBD4B25A" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>

<p>Apfelbaum, K. S., &amp; McMurray, B. (2011). Using variability to guide dimensional weighting: Associative mechanisms in early word learning. Cognitive Science, 35(6), 1105-1138. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01181.x" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>infant-directed speech, language development, parent-child interactions</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode we introduce our new podcast editor Jenna DiStefano, a developmental psychology PhD student at UC Davis. During the first segement, we chat with Jenna about her research path, decision to apply to graduate school, and where her work is heading. </p>

<p>In the second segement, we discuss Jenna&#39;s paper exploring contextual differences in infant-directed speech (IDS). Her paper analyzes how parents may talk differently to their infants depending on the context at-hand. We speculate about what makes IDS &quot;special&quot; and its role in language development -- is it the lack of &quot;common ground&quot; between a parent and infant? Is it emotion? Something else?  </p>

<p>Links<br>
DiStefano, J., Cohn, M., Zellou, G., &amp; Estes, K. G. (2025). Prosodic variation between contexts in infant-directed speech. Journal of Child Language, 1-23. <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-child-language/article/prosodic-variation-between-contexts-in-infantdirected-speech/2CAC2E419E9090FAABCCBBF3EBD4B25A" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>

<p>Apfelbaum, K. S., &amp; McMurray, B. (2011). Using variability to guide dimensional weighting: Associative mechanisms in early word learning. Cognitive Science, 35(6), 1105-1138. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01181.x" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>This episode we introduce our new podcast editor Jenna DiStefano, a developmental psychology PhD student at UC Davis. During the first segement, we chat with Jenna about her research path, decision to apply to graduate school, and where her work is heading. </p>

<p>In the second segement, we discuss Jenna&#39;s paper exploring contextual differences in infant-directed speech (IDS). Her paper analyzes how parents may talk differently to their infants depending on the context at-hand. We speculate about what makes IDS &quot;special&quot; and its role in language development -- is it the lack of &quot;common ground&quot; between a parent and infant? Is it emotion? Something else?  </p>

<p>Links<br>
DiStefano, J., Cohn, M., Zellou, G., &amp; Estes, K. G. (2025). Prosodic variation between contexts in infant-directed speech. Journal of Child Language, 1-23. <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-child-language/article/prosodic-variation-between-contexts-in-infantdirected-speech/2CAC2E419E9090FAABCCBBF3EBD4B25A" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>

<p>Apfelbaum, K. S., &amp; McMurray, B. (2011). Using variability to guide dimensional weighting: Associative mechanisms in early word learning. Cognitive Science, 35(6), 1105-1138. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01181.x" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+WU9zbElt</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+WU9zbElt" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="" role="host">Jenna DiStefano</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 32: Moral kombat (with Kiley Hamlin)</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/32</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b42e2353-1d70-4b21-a770-e31f7b999010</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 09:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/b42e2353-1d70-4b21-a770-e31f7b999010.mp3" length="102629382" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:49:47</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We were so lucky to be joined in this episode by the inestimable Professor Kiley Hamlin.  In the first segment, we chatted about how Kiley got interested in developmental science as well as about what it was like to be trained by Amanda Woodward (undergrad), Karen Wynn (grad), Paul Bloom (grad), and Laurie Santos (grad). </p>

<p>In the second segment, we chat about her recent paper in Nature Communications — this paper tested whether sociomoral evaluation is innate in 5 day olds. We also chat about how to reconcile the main finding of this paper — that 5-day-olds prefer helping events over hindering events — with the recent ManyBabies failure (you&#39;ll definitely want to hear her thoughts), as well as about her recent struggles to replicate classic findings in the lab but not online. We pondered about whether this is unique to Professor Hamlin or in fact is indicative of a much larger issue in the field. You&#39;re in for a treat with this one.</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Geraci, A., Surian, L., Tina, L. G., &amp; Hamlin, J. K. (2025). Human newborns spontaneously attend to prosocial interactions. Nature Communications, 16(1), 6304. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/desc.70124" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We were so lucky to be joined in this episode by the inestimable Professor Kiley Hamlin.  In the first segment, we chatted about how Kiley got interested in developmental science as well as about what it was like to be trained by Amanda Woodward (undergrad), Karen Wynn (grad), Paul Bloom (grad), and Laurie Santos (grad). </p>

<p>In the second segment, we chat about her recent paper in Nature Communications — this paper tested whether sociomoral evaluation is innate in 5 day olds. We also chat about how to reconcile the main finding of this paper — that 5-day-olds prefer helping events over hindering events — with the recent ManyBabies failure (you&#39;ll definitely want to hear her thoughts), as well as about her recent struggles to replicate classic findings in the lab but not online. We pondered about whether this is unique to Professor Hamlin or in fact is indicative of a much larger issue in the field. You&#39;re in for a treat with this one.</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Geraci, A., Surian, L., Tina, L. G., &amp; Hamlin, J. K. (2025). Human newborns spontaneously attend to prosocial interactions. Nature Communications, 16(1), 6304. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/desc.70124" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>We were so lucky to be joined in this episode by the inestimable Professor Kiley Hamlin.  In the first segment, we chatted about how Kiley got interested in developmental science as well as about what it was like to be trained by Amanda Woodward (undergrad), Karen Wynn (grad), Paul Bloom (grad), and Laurie Santos (grad). </p>

<p>In the second segment, we chat about her recent paper in Nature Communications — this paper tested whether sociomoral evaluation is innate in 5 day olds. We also chat about how to reconcile the main finding of this paper — that 5-day-olds prefer helping events over hindering events — with the recent ManyBabies failure (you&#39;ll definitely want to hear her thoughts), as well as about her recent struggles to replicate classic findings in the lab but not online. We pondered about whether this is unique to Professor Hamlin or in fact is indicative of a much larger issue in the field. You&#39;re in for a treat with this one.</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Geraci, A., Surian, L., Tina, L. G., &amp; Hamlin, J. K. (2025). Human newborns spontaneously attend to prosocial interactions. Nature Communications, 16(1), 6304. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/desc.70124" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+t7hIiaJp</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+t7hIiaJp" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 30: A conversation with a luminary #5: Rebecca Saxe</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/30</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">daa0ea1b-47b0-4e6b-9ec2-6f773386fad4</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2025 18:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/daa0ea1b-47b0-4e6b-9ec2-6f773386fad4.mp3" length="84580085" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>2:08:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this &quot;A conversation with a luminary&quot; episode, we chat with the inimitable and rewnowned Dr. Rebecca Saxe about her academic career, how she handles the constant stream of rejections, how she got interested in the developmental cognitive sciences, how she was as a student, how she came to work with Dr. Nancy Kanwisher as well as her views on Dr. Kanwisher as a mentor, and her transformative work on the Theory of Mind, among many other things.</p><p>Special Guest: Rebecca Saxe.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>cognitive development, theory of mind</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this &quot;A conversation with a luminary&quot; episode, we chat with the inimitable and rewnowned Dr. Rebecca Saxe about her academic career, how she handles the constant stream of rejections, how she got interested in the developmental cognitive sciences, how she was as a student, how she came to work with Dr. Nancy Kanwisher as well as her views on Dr. Kanwisher as a mentor, and her transformative work on the Theory of Mind, among many other things.</p><p>Special Guest: Rebecca Saxe.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this &quot;A conversation with a luminary&quot; episode, we chat with the inimitable and rewnowned Dr. Rebecca Saxe about her academic career, how she handles the constant stream of rejections, how she got interested in the developmental cognitive sciences, how she was as a student, how she came to work with Dr. Nancy Kanwisher as well as her views on Dr. Kanwisher as a mentor, and her transformative work on the Theory of Mind, among many other things.</p><p>Special Guest: Rebecca Saxe.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+bejgKBmq</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+bejgKBmq" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://saxelab.mit.edu/" role="guest">Rebecca Saxe</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 29: A happy little dance between attention and working memory (with Zsuzsa Kaldy)</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/29</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">3c12b086-69d5-4273-954c-f400c7e16e26</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2025 09:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/3c12b086-69d5-4273-954c-f400c7e16e26.mp3" length="115583206" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>2:09:20</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we chat with Zsuza Kaldy about her journey in science and her recent theory paper with Erik Blaser in which they argue that attention and working memory work in concert to pursue goals. We also chat her life in grad school, what it was like to be surrounded by luminaries such as Jerry Fodor and Rochel Gelman, to name a few. This was a fun episode! </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Blaser, E., &amp; Kaldy, Z. (2025). How attention and working memory work together in the pursuit of goals: The development of the sampling-remembering trade-off. Developmental Review, 75, 101187.<br>
 <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273229725000024?casa_token=OWZCi1E34z8AAAAA:9OJnPAX-TPThi0jp6bYUSHOlcd5se8TYrpy1OaOxD5Hrc9j5er1mRCZrLPYiFVjW87wmXcOy" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Zsuza Kaldy.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>working memory, cognitive control, cognitive development</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we chat with Zsuza Kaldy about her journey in science and her recent theory paper with Erik Blaser in which they argue that attention and working memory work in concert to pursue goals. We also chat her life in grad school, what it was like to be surrounded by luminaries such as Jerry Fodor and Rochel Gelman, to name a few. This was a fun episode! </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Blaser, E., &amp; Kaldy, Z. (2025). How attention and working memory work together in the pursuit of goals: The development of the sampling-remembering trade-off. Developmental Review, 75, 101187.<br>
 <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273229725000024?casa_token=OWZCi1E34z8AAAAA:9OJnPAX-TPThi0jp6bYUSHOlcd5se8TYrpy1OaOxD5Hrc9j5er1mRCZrLPYiFVjW87wmXcOy" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Zsuza Kaldy.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we chat with Zsuza Kaldy about her journey in science and her recent theory paper with Erik Blaser in which they argue that attention and working memory work in concert to pursue goals. We also chat her life in grad school, what it was like to be surrounded by luminaries such as Jerry Fodor and Rochel Gelman, to name a few. This was a fun episode! </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Blaser, E., &amp; Kaldy, Z. (2025). How attention and working memory work together in the pursuit of goals: The development of the sampling-remembering trade-off. Developmental Review, 75, 101187.<br>
 <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273229725000024?casa_token=OWZCi1E34z8AAAAA:9OJnPAX-TPThi0jp6bYUSHOlcd5se8TYrpy1OaOxD5Hrc9j5er1mRCZrLPYiFVjW87wmXcOy" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Zsuza Kaldy.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+5hXG4CWn</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+5hXG4CWn" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="" role="guest">Zsuza Kaldy</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 28: Seeing (can help you infer what someone else) is believing (with Sholei Croom)</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/28</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2da03cb9-578a-4ad0-94d0-7007ee6d4794</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 09:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/2da03cb9-578a-4ad0-94d0-7007ee6d4794.mp3" length="110172844" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:26:56</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We were delighted to be joined by Sholei Croom, a PhD student at Johns Hopkins working with Chaz Firestone. We open this episode, as always, by chatting about Sholei&#39;s journey in science. We then turn to their PNAS paper, &quot;Seeing and Understanding Epistemic Actions&quot; by Croom, Zhou, and Firestone (2023). This paper explores whether third-party observers can infer what other people are trying to learn simply by observing their actions. As we talk about in the episode, this project highlights an underexplored aspect of social perception: human learners can intuit what others are trying to learn simply from their actions.</p><p>Special Guest: Sholei Croom.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>action perception, social cognition, social psychology</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We were delighted to be joined by Sholei Croom, a PhD student at Johns Hopkins working with Chaz Firestone. We open this episode, as always, by chatting about Sholei&#39;s journey in science. We then turn to their PNAS paper, &quot;Seeing and Understanding Epistemic Actions&quot; by Croom, Zhou, and Firestone (2023). This paper explores whether third-party observers can infer what other people are trying to learn simply by observing their actions. As we talk about in the episode, this project highlights an underexplored aspect of social perception: human learners can intuit what others are trying to learn simply from their actions.</p><p>Special Guest: Sholei Croom.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>We were delighted to be joined by Sholei Croom, a PhD student at Johns Hopkins working with Chaz Firestone. We open this episode, as always, by chatting about Sholei&#39;s journey in science. We then turn to their PNAS paper, &quot;Seeing and Understanding Epistemic Actions&quot; by Croom, Zhou, and Firestone (2023). This paper explores whether third-party observers can infer what other people are trying to learn simply by observing their actions. As we talk about in the episode, this project highlights an underexplored aspect of social perception: human learners can intuit what others are trying to learn simply from their actions.</p><p>Special Guest: Sholei Croom.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+u0EvE549</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+u0EvE549" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://smcroom.com/" role="guest">Sholei Croom</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 27: A conversation with a luminary #4: Nora Newcombe</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/27</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1e86442d-2456-432d-8551-c157a1fdf9e1</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 09:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/1e86442d-2456-432d-8551-c157a1fdf9e1.mp3" length="79086817" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:39:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this &quot;A conversation with a luminary&quot; episode, we chat with the inimitable and rewnowned Dr. Nora Newcombe. Specifically, we talk about her journey in science, her views on Jerome &quot;Jerry&quot; Kagan as a mentor and what it was like working with him, her work and thoughts on cognitive maps, her work on the &quot;geometric module&quot;, as well as her thoughts on the nativism empricism debate, among other things. We enjoyed recording this episode, and we hope you enjoy listening to it!</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Newcombe, N. S. (2024). Learning to live in the spatial world: Experience-expectant and experience-dependent input. Developmental Review, 74, 101166.<br>
 <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273229724000509?casa_token=vGj3Qf7wWf0AAAAA:86geiGKEMhvvJlwRjJtdFj0lB_MXbOREO3XHlElv2NL_0ikBy1D2JxDf-b3rNeblqjuK68sl" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Nora Newcombe.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>cogntiive development, spatial learning, spatial cognition, nativism, empiricism</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this &quot;A conversation with a luminary&quot; episode, we chat with the inimitable and rewnowned Dr. Nora Newcombe. Specifically, we talk about her journey in science, her views on Jerome &quot;Jerry&quot; Kagan as a mentor and what it was like working with him, her work and thoughts on cognitive maps, her work on the &quot;geometric module&quot;, as well as her thoughts on the nativism empricism debate, among other things. We enjoyed recording this episode, and we hope you enjoy listening to it!</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Newcombe, N. S. (2024). Learning to live in the spatial world: Experience-expectant and experience-dependent input. Developmental Review, 74, 101166.<br>
 <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273229724000509?casa_token=vGj3Qf7wWf0AAAAA:86geiGKEMhvvJlwRjJtdFj0lB_MXbOREO3XHlElv2NL_0ikBy1D2JxDf-b3rNeblqjuK68sl" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Nora Newcombe.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this &quot;A conversation with a luminary&quot; episode, we chat with the inimitable and rewnowned Dr. Nora Newcombe. Specifically, we talk about her journey in science, her views on Jerome &quot;Jerry&quot; Kagan as a mentor and what it was like working with him, her work and thoughts on cognitive maps, her work on the &quot;geometric module&quot;, as well as her thoughts on the nativism empricism debate, among other things. We enjoyed recording this episode, and we hope you enjoy listening to it!</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Newcombe, N. S. (2024). Learning to live in the spatial world: Experience-expectant and experience-dependent input. Developmental Review, 74, 101166.<br>
 <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273229724000509?casa_token=vGj3Qf7wWf0AAAAA:86geiGKEMhvvJlwRjJtdFj0lB_MXbOREO3XHlElv2NL_0ikBy1D2JxDf-b3rNeblqjuK68sl" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Nora Newcombe.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+yO166LF0</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+yO166LF0" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.temple.edu/newcombe/" role="guest">Nora Newcombe</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 26: A conversation with a luminary #3: Susan Carey</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/26</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">a1b00fd6-6ac4-4662-9279-e1d16c0e3ac7</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/a1b00fd6-6ac4-4662-9279-e1d16c0e3ac7.mp3" length="101382624" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>2:14:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Susan Carey, a developmental cognitive scientist and luminary in the field, shared her extensive career and personal experiences, emphasizing her passion for understanding the human mind and her love for mentoring students. She discussed the evolution of developmental cognitive science, the nature of core cognition and perception, and the distinction between iconic and discursive representations. The conversation also touched on the origins of iconic representations, animal navigation, and the role of domain-general and domain-specific learning mechanisms in human cognition, as well as the importance of perseverance in the face of failure and rejection in one&#39;s career.</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Carey, S. E. (2022). Becoming a cognitive scientist. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 4(1), 1-19. <a href="https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-040622-091723" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Susan Carey.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>core knowledge, core concepts, innate knowledge, concept aquisition, origins of knowledge</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Susan Carey, a developmental cognitive scientist and luminary in the field, shared her extensive career and personal experiences, emphasizing her passion for understanding the human mind and her love for mentoring students. She discussed the evolution of developmental cognitive science, the nature of core cognition and perception, and the distinction between iconic and discursive representations. The conversation also touched on the origins of iconic representations, animal navigation, and the role of domain-general and domain-specific learning mechanisms in human cognition, as well as the importance of perseverance in the face of failure and rejection in one&#39;s career.</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Carey, S. E. (2022). Becoming a cognitive scientist. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 4(1), 1-19. <a href="https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-040622-091723" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Susan Carey.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Susan Carey, a developmental cognitive scientist and luminary in the field, shared her extensive career and personal experiences, emphasizing her passion for understanding the human mind and her love for mentoring students. She discussed the evolution of developmental cognitive science, the nature of core cognition and perception, and the distinction between iconic and discursive representations. The conversation also touched on the origins of iconic representations, animal navigation, and the role of domain-general and domain-specific learning mechanisms in human cognition, as well as the importance of perseverance in the face of failure and rejection in one&#39;s career.</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Carey, S. E. (2022). Becoming a cognitive scientist. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 4(1), 1-19. <a href="https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-040622-091723" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Susan Carey.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+BqsCOZDZ</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+BqsCOZDZ" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="" role="guest">Susan Carey</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 25: Something to pique your curiosity (with Gert Westermann)</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/25</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5bf4c99d-a44f-4999-93fd-0709e2f7a1e3</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2025 08:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/5bf4c99d-a44f-4999-93fd-0709e2f7a1e3.mp3" length="102501439" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:49:34</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the first half of this episode, Jenny and I chat with Dr. Gert Westermann about his rather circuitous journey in cognitive science as well as about the role of modeling in the cognitive sciences and an early encounter with nativism in a language class. In the second half, we talk about how curiosity might develop. We center the discussion on a somewhat recent paper, which was led by his then postdoc Dr. Katie Twomey, in which they propose a theory of how curiosity works mechanstically. He talks about how when this proposal was implemented in a computational model, it was able to account for existing infant categorization data. This episode was such a joy to record.</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Twomey, K. E., &amp; Westermann, G. (2018). Curiosity‐based learning in infants: A neurocomputational approach. Developmental science, 21(4), e12629. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/desc.12629" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Gert Westermann.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>curiosity, developmental mechanism, development science, cognitive science</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the first half of this episode, Jenny and I chat with Dr. Gert Westermann about his rather circuitous journey in cognitive science as well as about the role of modeling in the cognitive sciences and an early encounter with nativism in a language class. In the second half, we talk about how curiosity might develop. We center the discussion on a somewhat recent paper, which was led by his then postdoc Dr. Katie Twomey, in which they propose a theory of how curiosity works mechanstically. He talks about how when this proposal was implemented in a computational model, it was able to account for existing infant categorization data. This episode was such a joy to record.</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Twomey, K. E., &amp; Westermann, G. (2018). Curiosity‐based learning in infants: A neurocomputational approach. Developmental science, 21(4), e12629. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/desc.12629" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Gert Westermann.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In the first half of this episode, Jenny and I chat with Dr. Gert Westermann about his rather circuitous journey in cognitive science as well as about the role of modeling in the cognitive sciences and an early encounter with nativism in a language class. In the second half, we talk about how curiosity might develop. We center the discussion on a somewhat recent paper, which was led by his then postdoc Dr. Katie Twomey, in which they propose a theory of how curiosity works mechanstically. He talks about how when this proposal was implemented in a computational model, it was able to account for existing infant categorization data. This episode was such a joy to record.</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Twomey, K. E., &amp; Westermann, G. (2018). Curiosity‐based learning in infants: A neurocomputational approach. Developmental science, 21(4), e12629. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/desc.12629" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Gert Westermann.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+7muA4KyX</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+7muA4KyX" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="" role="guest">Gert Westermann</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 24: People and objects are different, and infants innately know this. Or do they?</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/24</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">6bc53802-e125-4d4e-8b4d-14f53ccdbb85</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2025 08:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/6bc53802-e125-4d4e-8b4d-14f53ccdbb85.mp3" length="86999178" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:41:01</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Deon and Jenny open this episode, which is a return their classic one-on-one format, by discussing the academic job market, imposter syndrome, and careful science. Following this brief discussion, Jenny and Deon discuss Deon&#39;s recent paper titled, &quot;An associative-learning account of how infants learn about causal action in animates and inanimates: A critical reexamination of four classic studies.&quot; Deon talks about the motivation for writing this proposal as well as what his account is of how infants might begin to learn about how animates and inanimates differ from one another in terms of their causal abilities.  It will come as no surprise that Deon thinks that this knowledge is acquired, and that Jenny is a bit skeptical (although, as you&#39;lll hear, there are signs that she may see the merit in Deon&#39;s argument). At a broad level, this episode has it all — we cover philosophy, computational modeling, mechanisms, and developmental science!</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Benton, D. T. (2024). An associative-learning account of how infants learn about causal action in animates and inanimates: A critical reexamination of four classic studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2025-27513-001" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>associative learning, empiricism, nativism, mechanism, computational modeling</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Deon and Jenny open this episode, which is a return their classic one-on-one format, by discussing the academic job market, imposter syndrome, and careful science. Following this brief discussion, Jenny and Deon discuss Deon&#39;s recent paper titled, &quot;An associative-learning account of how infants learn about causal action in animates and inanimates: A critical reexamination of four classic studies.&quot; Deon talks about the motivation for writing this proposal as well as what his account is of how infants might begin to learn about how animates and inanimates differ from one another in terms of their causal abilities.  It will come as no surprise that Deon thinks that this knowledge is acquired, and that Jenny is a bit skeptical (although, as you&#39;lll hear, there are signs that she may see the merit in Deon&#39;s argument). At a broad level, this episode has it all — we cover philosophy, computational modeling, mechanisms, and developmental science!</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Benton, D. T. (2024). An associative-learning account of how infants learn about causal action in animates and inanimates: A critical reexamination of four classic studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2025-27513-001" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Deon and Jenny open this episode, which is a return their classic one-on-one format, by discussing the academic job market, imposter syndrome, and careful science. Following this brief discussion, Jenny and Deon discuss Deon&#39;s recent paper titled, &quot;An associative-learning account of how infants learn about causal action in animates and inanimates: A critical reexamination of four classic studies.&quot; Deon talks about the motivation for writing this proposal as well as what his account is of how infants might begin to learn about how animates and inanimates differ from one another in terms of their causal abilities.  It will come as no surprise that Deon thinks that this knowledge is acquired, and that Jenny is a bit skeptical (although, as you&#39;lll hear, there are signs that she may see the merit in Deon&#39;s argument). At a broad level, this episode has it all — we cover philosophy, computational modeling, mechanisms, and developmental science!</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Benton, D. T. (2024). An associative-learning account of how infants learn about causal action in animates and inanimates: A critical reexamination of four classic studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2025-27513-001" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+bhsY7s-a</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+bhsY7s-a" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 23: "Who's my happy baby? Yes, you are!" The scoop on infant directed speech! (with Martin Zettersten)</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/23</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">002cf3c8-7992-4da5-9e41-0859783d8dea</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 10:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/002cf3c8-7992-4da5-9e41-0859783d8dea.mp3" length="117111726" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:54:45</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we chat with Dr. Martin Zettersten about a ManyBabies project that he was a part of, which assessed the reliability of infant directed speech as well as the conditions that affect whether infants show a preference for it over adult directed speech. We also talk about Martin&#39;s journey in cognitive science, life as a new assistant professor, and how he met Deon loooong ago! We hope you enjoy this episode.</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>The ManyBabies Consortium (2020). Quantifying sources of variability in infancy research using the infant-directed speech preference. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(1), 24–52. <a href="https://mzettersten.github.io/assets/pdf/ManyBabies1.pdf" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>

<p>Schreiner, M., Zettersten, M., Bergmann, C., Frank, Michael C., Fritzsche, T., Gonzalez-Gomez, N., Hamlin, K., Kartushina, N., Kellier, D.J., Mani, N., Mayor, J., Saffran, J., Shukla, M., Silverstein, P., Soderstrom, M., &amp; Lippold, M. (2024). Limited evidence of test-retest reliability in infant-directed speech preference in a large pre-registered infant sample. Developmental Science. 27(6), e13551. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/desc.13551" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>

<p>Zettersten, M.<em>, Cox, C.M.M.</em>, Bergmann, C.*, Tsui, A.S.M., Soderstrom, M., Mayor, J., Lundwall, R.A., Lewis, M., Kosie, J.E., Kartushina, N., Fusaroli, R., Frank, M.C., Byers-Heinlein, K., Black, A.K., &amp; Mathur, M.B. (2024). Evidence for infant-directed speech preference is consistent across large-scale, multi-site replication and meta-analysis. Open Mind, 8, 439-461. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00134" rel="nofollow">https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00134</a> *equal authorship <a href="https://direct.mit.edu/opmi/article/doi/10.1162/opmi_a_00134/120611" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Martin Zettersten.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>infant directed speech, manybabies, perceptual development</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we chat with Dr. Martin Zettersten about a ManyBabies project that he was a part of, which assessed the reliability of infant directed speech as well as the conditions that affect whether infants show a preference for it over adult directed speech. We also talk about Martin&#39;s journey in cognitive science, life as a new assistant professor, and how he met Deon loooong ago! We hope you enjoy this episode.</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>The ManyBabies Consortium (2020). Quantifying sources of variability in infancy research using the infant-directed speech preference. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(1), 24–52. <a href="https://mzettersten.github.io/assets/pdf/ManyBabies1.pdf" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>

<p>Schreiner, M., Zettersten, M., Bergmann, C., Frank, Michael C., Fritzsche, T., Gonzalez-Gomez, N., Hamlin, K., Kartushina, N., Kellier, D.J., Mani, N., Mayor, J., Saffran, J., Shukla, M., Silverstein, P., Soderstrom, M., &amp; Lippold, M. (2024). Limited evidence of test-retest reliability in infant-directed speech preference in a large pre-registered infant sample. Developmental Science. 27(6), e13551. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/desc.13551" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>

<p>Zettersten, M.<em>, Cox, C.M.M.</em>, Bergmann, C.*, Tsui, A.S.M., Soderstrom, M., Mayor, J., Lundwall, R.A., Lewis, M., Kosie, J.E., Kartushina, N., Fusaroli, R., Frank, M.C., Byers-Heinlein, K., Black, A.K., &amp; Mathur, M.B. (2024). Evidence for infant-directed speech preference is consistent across large-scale, multi-site replication and meta-analysis. Open Mind, 8, 439-461. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00134" rel="nofollow">https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00134</a> *equal authorship <a href="https://direct.mit.edu/opmi/article/doi/10.1162/opmi_a_00134/120611" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Martin Zettersten.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we chat with Dr. Martin Zettersten about a ManyBabies project that he was a part of, which assessed the reliability of infant directed speech as well as the conditions that affect whether infants show a preference for it over adult directed speech. We also talk about Martin&#39;s journey in cognitive science, life as a new assistant professor, and how he met Deon loooong ago! We hope you enjoy this episode.</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>The ManyBabies Consortium (2020). Quantifying sources of variability in infancy research using the infant-directed speech preference. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(1), 24–52. <a href="https://mzettersten.github.io/assets/pdf/ManyBabies1.pdf" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>

<p>Schreiner, M., Zettersten, M., Bergmann, C., Frank, Michael C., Fritzsche, T., Gonzalez-Gomez, N., Hamlin, K., Kartushina, N., Kellier, D.J., Mani, N., Mayor, J., Saffran, J., Shukla, M., Silverstein, P., Soderstrom, M., &amp; Lippold, M. (2024). Limited evidence of test-retest reliability in infant-directed speech preference in a large pre-registered infant sample. Developmental Science. 27(6), e13551. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/desc.13551" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>

<p>Zettersten, M.<em>, Cox, C.M.M.</em>, Bergmann, C.*, Tsui, A.S.M., Soderstrom, M., Mayor, J., Lundwall, R.A., Lewis, M., Kosie, J.E., Kartushina, N., Fusaroli, R., Frank, M.C., Byers-Heinlein, K., Black, A.K., &amp; Mathur, M.B. (2024). Evidence for infant-directed speech preference is consistent across large-scale, multi-site replication and meta-analysis. Open Mind, 8, 439-461. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00134" rel="nofollow">https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00134</a> *equal authorship <a href="https://direct.mit.edu/opmi/article/doi/10.1162/opmi_a_00134/120611" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Martin Zettersten.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+Ulaxh99Y</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+Ulaxh99Y" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://mzettersten.github.io/" role="guest">Martin Zettersten</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 22: A conversation with a luminary #2: Fei Xu</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/22</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">02fb3aba-0d46-4302-88f9-f7ad513b928d</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2024 18:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/02fb3aba-0d46-4302-88f9-f7ad513b928d.mp3" length="98140562" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:49:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We&#39;re continuing our &quot;A conversation with a luminary&quot; series with Professor Fei Xu! This was such a great episode to record — we chat with Fei about her journey in cognitive science, her experiences as a graduate student at MIT where she was surrounded by the likes of Noam Chomsky, Jerry Fodor, Thomas Kuhn, Susan Carey, among others, and her work on number cognition and probabilistic reasoning in preverbal infants. In the second segment, we chat about &quot;rational constructivism&quot;, which is an attempt to take the best parts of nativism and constructivism to explain change and to unify her empirical work under one theoretical umbrella. </p>

<p>Sit back and enjoy this fun episode!</p><p>Special Guest: Fei Xu.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>rational constructivism, luminary series, fei xu</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We&#39;re continuing our &quot;A conversation with a luminary&quot; series with Professor Fei Xu! This was such a great episode to record — we chat with Fei about her journey in cognitive science, her experiences as a graduate student at MIT where she was surrounded by the likes of Noam Chomsky, Jerry Fodor, Thomas Kuhn, Susan Carey, among others, and her work on number cognition and probabilistic reasoning in preverbal infants. In the second segment, we chat about &quot;rational constructivism&quot;, which is an attempt to take the best parts of nativism and constructivism to explain change and to unify her empirical work under one theoretical umbrella. </p>

<p>Sit back and enjoy this fun episode!</p><p>Special Guest: Fei Xu.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>We&#39;re continuing our &quot;A conversation with a luminary&quot; series with Professor Fei Xu! This was such a great episode to record — we chat with Fei about her journey in cognitive science, her experiences as a graduate student at MIT where she was surrounded by the likes of Noam Chomsky, Jerry Fodor, Thomas Kuhn, Susan Carey, among others, and her work on number cognition and probabilistic reasoning in preverbal infants. In the second segment, we chat about &quot;rational constructivism&quot;, which is an attempt to take the best parts of nativism and constructivism to explain change and to unify her empirical work under one theoretical umbrella. </p>

<p>Sit back and enjoy this fun episode!</p><p>Special Guest: Fei Xu.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+ngDY4hxN</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+ngDY4hxN" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="" role="guest">Fei Xu</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 21: A conversation with a luminary #1: Jenny Saffran</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/21</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9eaf3d89-ba17-4b8c-a661-fd2cbc6b68bb</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/9eaf3d89-ba17-4b8c-a661-fd2cbc6b68bb.mp3" length="64555777" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:18:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We&#39;ve begun a brand new series called &quot;A conversation with a luminary.&quot; In the series, we will chat with a trailblazing figure in developmental cognitive science about their journey in science, how they stumbled on the topic they&#39;re most known for, and advice they would give to young academics and junior faculty.</p>

<p>We are kicking off this series with a conversation with the Letters &amp; Science Mary Herman Rubinstein Professor Jenny Saffran! Professor Saffran is renowned for her groundbreaking research on infant statistical learning, which demonstrates how infants use patterns in sound to segment and learn language. Her work has fundamentally shaped our understanding of how cognitive mechanisms support early language acquisition.</p>

<p>If there is a developmental cognitive scientist you&#39;d like to hear from, be sure to email us at <a href="mailto:theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com" rel="nofollow">theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com</a></p><p>Special Guest: Jenny Saffran.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>statistical learning, luminary series, jenny saffran, infant</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We&#39;ve begun a brand new series called &quot;A conversation with a luminary.&quot; In the series, we will chat with a trailblazing figure in developmental cognitive science about their journey in science, how they stumbled on the topic they&#39;re most known for, and advice they would give to young academics and junior faculty.</p>

<p>We are kicking off this series with a conversation with the Letters &amp; Science Mary Herman Rubinstein Professor Jenny Saffran! Professor Saffran is renowned for her groundbreaking research on infant statistical learning, which demonstrates how infants use patterns in sound to segment and learn language. Her work has fundamentally shaped our understanding of how cognitive mechanisms support early language acquisition.</p>

<p>If there is a developmental cognitive scientist you&#39;d like to hear from, be sure to email us at <a href="mailto:theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com" rel="nofollow">theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com</a></p><p>Special Guest: Jenny Saffran.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>We&#39;ve begun a brand new series called &quot;A conversation with a luminary.&quot; In the series, we will chat with a trailblazing figure in developmental cognitive science about their journey in science, how they stumbled on the topic they&#39;re most known for, and advice they would give to young academics and junior faculty.</p>

<p>We are kicking off this series with a conversation with the Letters &amp; Science Mary Herman Rubinstein Professor Jenny Saffran! Professor Saffran is renowned for her groundbreaking research on infant statistical learning, which demonstrates how infants use patterns in sound to segment and learn language. Her work has fundamentally shaped our understanding of how cognitive mechanisms support early language acquisition.</p>

<p>If there is a developmental cognitive scientist you&#39;d like to hear from, be sure to email us at <a href="mailto:theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com" rel="nofollow">theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com</a></p><p>Special Guest: Jenny Saffran.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+1-0MQz3i</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+1-0MQz3i" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="" role="guest">Jenny Saffran</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 20: 3-month-olds are rational?! And can represent others' goals?! (with Brandon Woo)</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/20</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">1e5bcaa7-4b0f-40c2-9d7b-509c6f063cab</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2024 15:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/1e5bcaa7-4b0f-40c2-9d7b-509c6f063cab.mp3" length="94732814" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:40:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this jam-packed episode, we chat with Dr. Brandon Woo about a recent study of his published in <em>Developmental Science</em> that was designed to examine whether 3-month-olds, who are not yet able to reach for and grab things on their own, can nonetheless infer the goal of another person&#39;s actions! We also get to chat with Dr. Woo about his journey in cognitive scientist and get to hear about what he&#39;d be doing if he weren&#39;t a developmental cognitive scientist! Deon and Jenny also go back and forth a bit about how best to interpret these data! A great episode all around!</p>

<p>Links</p>

<p>Woo, B. M., Liu, S., &amp; Spelke, E. S. (2024). Infants rationally infer the goals of other people&#39;s reaches in the absence of first‐person experience with reaching actions. Developmental Science, 27(3), e13453. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/desc.13453?casa_token=45cda6e1seQAAAAA:vam5p30UoGekevQDEi7Fn3ZKKQpLVWe8N_AZxbV5qaFlnujuQ7qupspSDeSVtBvMnH1uelcoMoVCqA" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Brandon Woo.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>prereaching infants, goal-directed action, nature vs. nurture, mechanisms of change</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this jam-packed episode, we chat with Dr. Brandon Woo about a recent study of his published in <em>Developmental Science</em> that was designed to examine whether 3-month-olds, who are not yet able to reach for and grab things on their own, can nonetheless infer the goal of another person&#39;s actions! We also get to chat with Dr. Woo about his journey in cognitive scientist and get to hear about what he&#39;d be doing if he weren&#39;t a developmental cognitive scientist! Deon and Jenny also go back and forth a bit about how best to interpret these data! A great episode all around!</p>

<p>Links</p>

<p>Woo, B. M., Liu, S., &amp; Spelke, E. S. (2024). Infants rationally infer the goals of other people&#39;s reaches in the absence of first‐person experience with reaching actions. Developmental Science, 27(3), e13453. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/desc.13453?casa_token=45cda6e1seQAAAAA:vam5p30UoGekevQDEi7Fn3ZKKQpLVWe8N_AZxbV5qaFlnujuQ7qupspSDeSVtBvMnH1uelcoMoVCqA" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Brandon Woo.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this jam-packed episode, we chat with Dr. Brandon Woo about a recent study of his published in <em>Developmental Science</em> that was designed to examine whether 3-month-olds, who are not yet able to reach for and grab things on their own, can nonetheless infer the goal of another person&#39;s actions! We also get to chat with Dr. Woo about his journey in cognitive scientist and get to hear about what he&#39;d be doing if he weren&#39;t a developmental cognitive scientist! Deon and Jenny also go back and forth a bit about how best to interpret these data! A great episode all around!</p>

<p>Links</p>

<p>Woo, B. M., Liu, S., &amp; Spelke, E. S. (2024). Infants rationally infer the goals of other people&#39;s reaches in the absence of first‐person experience with reaching actions. Developmental Science, 27(3), e13453. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/desc.13453?casa_token=45cda6e1seQAAAAA:vam5p30UoGekevQDEi7Fn3ZKKQpLVWe8N_AZxbV5qaFlnujuQ7qupspSDeSVtBvMnH1uelcoMoVCqA" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Brandon Woo.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+xtStJjTC</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+xtStJjTC" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://bmwoo.github.io/" role="guest">Brandon Woo</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 19: Is Word Learning Innate or Learned? Recent Evidence Suggests It Might be the Latter (with Wai Keen Vong)</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/19</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f32f7098-c664-4781-814e-d66eafbd9d92</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 10:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/f32f7098-c664-4781-814e-d66eafbd9d92.mp3" length="77872813" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:28:32</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Unless you live under a rock, you&#39;ve no doubt heard about that recent Science paper showing that an artificial neural network trained on visual and linguistic data from a child&#39;s egocentric recordings was able to map words with their referents. What makes this paper particularly significant is that it demonstrates that there is sufficient structure in the  environment to support children&#39;s ability to learn words, without the need for strong inductive and innate biases or domain-specific knowledge.</p>

<p>Well, guess what? In this episode, we were joined by the lead author of that paper, Dr. Wai Keen Vong! We cover lots of ground in this episode — we talk about the paper, its motivations, Wei Keen&#39;s journey in science, how one might go about learning more about computational modeling, among other things. </p>

<p>Links</p>

<p>Vong, W. K., Wang, W., Orhan, A. E., &amp; Lake, B. M (2024). Grounded language acquisition through the eyes and ears of a single child. Science. <a href="https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.adi1374?casa_token=D8nleDiQCAEAAAAA:C5GWxb9DDPVHHQPk2LbIwyZLHV-DBBEHXw0X0Udu9ZLQbBqJjobNn4tOlAOAT6X2JfLF_QdNfF3NXg" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Wai Keen Vong.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Unless you live under a rock, you&#39;ve no doubt heard about that recent Science paper showing that an artificial neural network trained on visual and linguistic data from a child&#39;s egocentric recordings was able to map words with their referents. What makes this paper particularly significant is that it demonstrates that there is sufficient structure in the  environment to support children&#39;s ability to learn words, without the need for strong inductive and innate biases or domain-specific knowledge.</p>

<p>Well, guess what? In this episode, we were joined by the lead author of that paper, Dr. Wai Keen Vong! We cover lots of ground in this episode — we talk about the paper, its motivations, Wei Keen&#39;s journey in science, how one might go about learning more about computational modeling, among other things. </p>

<p>Links</p>

<p>Vong, W. K., Wang, W., Orhan, A. E., &amp; Lake, B. M (2024). Grounded language acquisition through the eyes and ears of a single child. Science. <a href="https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.adi1374?casa_token=D8nleDiQCAEAAAAA:C5GWxb9DDPVHHQPk2LbIwyZLHV-DBBEHXw0X0Udu9ZLQbBqJjobNn4tOlAOAT6X2JfLF_QdNfF3NXg" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Wai Keen Vong.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Unless you live under a rock, you&#39;ve no doubt heard about that recent Science paper showing that an artificial neural network trained on visual and linguistic data from a child&#39;s egocentric recordings was able to map words with their referents. What makes this paper particularly significant is that it demonstrates that there is sufficient structure in the  environment to support children&#39;s ability to learn words, without the need for strong inductive and innate biases or domain-specific knowledge.</p>

<p>Well, guess what? In this episode, we were joined by the lead author of that paper, Dr. Wai Keen Vong! We cover lots of ground in this episode — we talk about the paper, its motivations, Wei Keen&#39;s journey in science, how one might go about learning more about computational modeling, among other things. </p>

<p>Links</p>

<p>Vong, W. K., Wang, W., Orhan, A. E., &amp; Lake, B. M (2024). Grounded language acquisition through the eyes and ears of a single child. Science. <a href="https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.adi1374?casa_token=D8nleDiQCAEAAAAA:C5GWxb9DDPVHHQPk2LbIwyZLHV-DBBEHXw0X0Udu9ZLQbBqJjobNn4tOlAOAT6X2JfLF_QdNfF3NXg" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Wai Keen Vong.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+qLLSzFZC</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+qLLSzFZC" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://www.waikeenvong.com/" role="guest">Wai Keen Vong</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 18: All about math (with Dana Miller-Cotto)</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/18</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5d7d4741-8504-498f-b68e-ac4ab1bd886a</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 07:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/5d7d4741-8504-498f-b68e-ac4ab1bd886a.mp3" length="41876994" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:34:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this jam-packed episode with chat with Dr. Dana Miller-Cotto about all manner of things, from her path to higher education, to her thoughts on what it means to raise a kid as a faculty member, to her early relationship with mathematics, to her impressive body of research examining the relation between working memory and mathematics performance.</p>

<p>You don&#39;t want to miss this episode!</p>

<p>Links</p>

<p>Miller‐Cotto, D., Smith, L. V., Wang, A. H., &amp; Ribner, A. D. (2022). Changing the conversation: A culturally responsive perspective on executive functions, minoritized children and their families. Infant and Child Development, 31(1), e2286. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/icd.2286?casa_token=aOD7-G3zLfIAAAAA:eRpgY7Bx0Vxmh-8AQ7wyJThdbB4SmTRSLWPqUV-axqO-l-0cH2ZB15ZvpAeTl1TKDhLUY-XVBUoINQ" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>

<p>Miller-Cotto, D., &amp; Byrnes, J. P. (2020). What’s the best way to characterize the relationship between working memory and achievement?: An initial examination of competing theories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(5), 1074–1084. <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-42401-001" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Dana Miller-Cotto.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>mathematics, education, diversity</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this jam-packed episode with chat with Dr. Dana Miller-Cotto about all manner of things, from her path to higher education, to her thoughts on what it means to raise a kid as a faculty member, to her early relationship with mathematics, to her impressive body of research examining the relation between working memory and mathematics performance.</p>

<p>You don&#39;t want to miss this episode!</p>

<p>Links</p>

<p>Miller‐Cotto, D., Smith, L. V., Wang, A. H., &amp; Ribner, A. D. (2022). Changing the conversation: A culturally responsive perspective on executive functions, minoritized children and their families. Infant and Child Development, 31(1), e2286. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/icd.2286?casa_token=aOD7-G3zLfIAAAAA:eRpgY7Bx0Vxmh-8AQ7wyJThdbB4SmTRSLWPqUV-axqO-l-0cH2ZB15ZvpAeTl1TKDhLUY-XVBUoINQ" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>

<p>Miller-Cotto, D., &amp; Byrnes, J. P. (2020). What’s the best way to characterize the relationship between working memory and achievement?: An initial examination of competing theories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(5), 1074–1084. <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-42401-001" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Dana Miller-Cotto.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this jam-packed episode with chat with Dr. Dana Miller-Cotto about all manner of things, from her path to higher education, to her thoughts on what it means to raise a kid as a faculty member, to her early relationship with mathematics, to her impressive body of research examining the relation between working memory and mathematics performance.</p>

<p>You don&#39;t want to miss this episode!</p>

<p>Links</p>

<p>Miller‐Cotto, D., Smith, L. V., Wang, A. H., &amp; Ribner, A. D. (2022). Changing the conversation: A culturally responsive perspective on executive functions, minoritized children and their families. Infant and Child Development, 31(1), e2286. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/icd.2286?casa_token=aOD7-G3zLfIAAAAA:eRpgY7Bx0Vxmh-8AQ7wyJThdbB4SmTRSLWPqUV-axqO-l-0cH2ZB15ZvpAeTl1TKDhLUY-XVBUoINQ" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>

<p>Miller-Cotto, D., &amp; Byrnes, J. P. (2020). What’s the best way to characterize the relationship between working memory and achievement?: An initial examination of competing theories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(5), 1074–1084. <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-42401-001" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Dana Miller-Cotto.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+5DNx2xC-</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+5DNx2xC-" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://www.danamillercotto.com/" role="guest">Dana Miller-Cotto</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 17: Is It Language of Thoughts (LoTs) All the Way Down? (with Melissa Kibbe)</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/17</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">ed2305cd-052f-43a7-9d8c-5a6bd5f12043</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2023 09:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/ed2305cd-052f-43a7-9d8c-5a6bd5f12043.mp3" length="72764166" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:45:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>How is the mind structured? Does it come equipped with its own &quot;language&quot;? These are questions that humans have been pondering as early as history goes. Yet cognitive scientists today still have drastically different opinions about the answers to these questions. We chatted with Professor Melissa Kibbe from Boston University about her journey as a cognitive developmental scientist. We then focused on her recent article on what &quot;Language of Thought&quot; is and how we can find empirical evidence for its presence (or absence) in the infant mind.</p>

<p>Links</p>

<p>Kibbe, M.M. (in press). The Language of Thought as a working hypothesis for developmental cognitive science. Commentary on Quilty-Dunn, Porot, &amp; Mandelbaum, in Behavior &amp; Brain Sciences. <a href="https://psyarxiv.com/c8fp3" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>

<p>Quilty-Dunn, J., Porot, N., &amp; Mandelbaum, E. (2022). The best game in town: The re-emergence of the language of thought hypothesis across the cognitive sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1-55. <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/abs/best-game-in-town-the-reemergence-of-the-language-of-thought-hypothesis-across-the-cognitive-sciences/76F46784C6C07FF52FF45B934D6D3542" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Melissa Kibbe.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>LoT, representation, infants</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>How is the mind structured? Does it come equipped with its own &quot;language&quot;? These are questions that humans have been pondering as early as history goes. Yet cognitive scientists today still have drastically different opinions about the answers to these questions. We chatted with Professor Melissa Kibbe from Boston University about her journey as a cognitive developmental scientist. We then focused on her recent article on what &quot;Language of Thought&quot; is and how we can find empirical evidence for its presence (or absence) in the infant mind.</p>

<p>Links</p>

<p>Kibbe, M.M. (in press). The Language of Thought as a working hypothesis for developmental cognitive science. Commentary on Quilty-Dunn, Porot, &amp; Mandelbaum, in Behavior &amp; Brain Sciences. <a href="https://psyarxiv.com/c8fp3" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>

<p>Quilty-Dunn, J., Porot, N., &amp; Mandelbaum, E. (2022). The best game in town: The re-emergence of the language of thought hypothesis across the cognitive sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1-55. <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/abs/best-game-in-town-the-reemergence-of-the-language-of-thought-hypothesis-across-the-cognitive-sciences/76F46784C6C07FF52FF45B934D6D3542" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Melissa Kibbe.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>How is the mind structured? Does it come equipped with its own &quot;language&quot;? These are questions that humans have been pondering as early as history goes. Yet cognitive scientists today still have drastically different opinions about the answers to these questions. We chatted with Professor Melissa Kibbe from Boston University about her journey as a cognitive developmental scientist. We then focused on her recent article on what &quot;Language of Thought&quot; is and how we can find empirical evidence for its presence (or absence) in the infant mind.</p>

<p>Links</p>

<p>Kibbe, M.M. (in press). The Language of Thought as a working hypothesis for developmental cognitive science. Commentary on Quilty-Dunn, Porot, &amp; Mandelbaum, in Behavior &amp; Brain Sciences. <a href="https://psyarxiv.com/c8fp3" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p>

<p>Quilty-Dunn, J., Porot, N., &amp; Mandelbaum, E. (2022). The best game in town: The re-emergence of the language of thought hypothesis across the cognitive sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1-55. <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences/article/abs/best-game-in-town-the-reemergence-of-the-language-of-thought-hypothesis-across-the-cognitive-sciences/76F46784C6C07FF52FF45B934D6D3542" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Melissa Kibbe.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+cPPaKtc-</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+cPPaKtc-" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://www.bu.edu/cdl/developing-minds-lab/" role="guest">Melissa Kibbe</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 16: Does alcohol make for worse mommies? (with Debrielle Jacques)</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/16</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b843f9b7-d385-452a-93ac-bd370a59a724</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 21:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/b843f9b7-d385-452a-93ac-bd370a59a724.mp3" length="65501047" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:41:06</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Debrielle Jacques join us in this episode to talk about her wonderful research on the relation between maternal alcohol dependence and harsh parental practices, including one possible mechanism by which the former leads to the latter. Plus, we talk about the critical role of and need for representation and diversity in science.</p>

<p>Links</p>

<p>Jacques, D. T., Sturge-Apple, M. L., Davies, P. T., &amp; Cicchetti, D. (2020). Maternal alcohol dependence and harsh caregiving across parenting contexts: The moderating role of child negative emotionality. Development and psychopathology, 32(4), 1509-1523. <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/development-and-psychopathology/article/maternal-alcohol-dependence-and-harsh-caregiving-across-parenting-contexts-the-moderating-role-of-child-negative-emotionality/84FBFFCF641F06BDC0FD4ADFE88C797A" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Debrielle Jacques.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Debrielle Jacques join us in this episode to talk about her wonderful research on the relation between maternal alcohol dependence and harsh parental practices, including one possible mechanism by which the former leads to the latter. Plus, we talk about the critical role of and need for representation and diversity in science.</p>

<p>Links</p>

<p>Jacques, D. T., Sturge-Apple, M. L., Davies, P. T., &amp; Cicchetti, D. (2020). Maternal alcohol dependence and harsh caregiving across parenting contexts: The moderating role of child negative emotionality. Development and psychopathology, 32(4), 1509-1523. <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/development-and-psychopathology/article/maternal-alcohol-dependence-and-harsh-caregiving-across-parenting-contexts-the-moderating-role-of-child-negative-emotionality/84FBFFCF641F06BDC0FD4ADFE88C797A" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Debrielle Jacques.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Debrielle Jacques join us in this episode to talk about her wonderful research on the relation between maternal alcohol dependence and harsh parental practices, including one possible mechanism by which the former leads to the latter. Plus, we talk about the critical role of and need for representation and diversity in science.</p>

<p>Links</p>

<p>Jacques, D. T., Sturge-Apple, M. L., Davies, P. T., &amp; Cicchetti, D. (2020). Maternal alcohol dependence and harsh caregiving across parenting contexts: The moderating role of child negative emotionality. Development and psychopathology, 32(4), 1509-1523. <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/development-and-psychopathology/article/maternal-alcohol-dependence-and-harsh-caregiving-across-parenting-contexts-the-moderating-role-of-child-negative-emotionality/84FBFFCF641F06BDC0FD4ADFE88C797A" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Debrielle Jacques.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+yjzcyGJO</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+yjzcyGJO" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://www.debriellejacques.com/" role="guest">Debrielle Jacques</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 15: Foreshadowing forgiveness? (with Meltem Yucel)</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/15</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b303d504-c549-4ec3-b882-e4c7c5e353b0</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2023 21:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/b303d504-c549-4ec3-b882-e4c7c5e353b0.mp3" length="88562988" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:35:16</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We didn&#39;t mean to keep you waiting but, in this episode, Candy and Deon interview Dr. Meltem Yucel. We open the episode by discussing Meltem&#39;s outstanding project, the <a href="https://www.psychresearchlist.com/" rel="nofollow">Psych Research List</a>, which is geared towards making psychology more transparent and accessible to all.</p>

<p>We then discuss one of Dr. Yucel&#39;s papers, which concern the role of disclaimers in eliciting forgiveness! This was a fascinating discussion to have, and we hope you enjoy!</p><p>Special Guest: Meltem Yucel.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We didn&#39;t mean to keep you waiting but, in this episode, Candy and Deon interview Dr. Meltem Yucel. We open the episode by discussing Meltem&#39;s outstanding project, the <a href="https://www.psychresearchlist.com/" rel="nofollow">Psych Research List</a>, which is geared towards making psychology more transparent and accessible to all.</p>

<p>We then discuss one of Dr. Yucel&#39;s papers, which concern the role of disclaimers in eliciting forgiveness! This was a fascinating discussion to have, and we hope you enjoy!</p><p>Special Guest: Meltem Yucel.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>We didn&#39;t mean to keep you waiting but, in this episode, Candy and Deon interview Dr. Meltem Yucel. We open the episode by discussing Meltem&#39;s outstanding project, the <a href="https://www.psychresearchlist.com/" rel="nofollow">Psych Research List</a>, which is geared towards making psychology more transparent and accessible to all.</p>

<p>We then discuss one of Dr. Yucel&#39;s papers, which concern the role of disclaimers in eliciting forgiveness! This was a fascinating discussion to have, and we hope you enjoy!</p><p>Special Guest: Meltem Yucel.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+5YawQ2gr</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+5YawQ2gr" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://www.meltemyucel.com/" role="guest">Meltem Yucel</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 14: The "moral principles" infants live by (with Fransisca Ting)</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/14</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2a1629de-21c7-46b7-9ea1-b1adfc1443f9</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2023 20:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/2a1629de-21c7-46b7-9ea1-b1adfc1443f9.mp3" length="74939947" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:39:28</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we talk with Dr. Fransisca Ting about her chapter on infant morality, &quot;Principles and Concepts in Early Moral Cognition&quot;. We specifically discuss whether, in fact, infants are born with moral principles, what those principles might, and whether there is evidence for such a position.</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Ting, F., Dawkins, M. B., Stavans, M., &amp; Baillargeon, R. (2019). Principles and concepts in early moral cognition. The social brain: A developmental perspective, 41-65. <a href="https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=uM7tDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT27&dq=fransisca+ting+infant+morality&ots=oAqGY5yBn3&sig=o8e2SAFu942ZP4wrSwGAtCm80rw#v=onepage&q=fransisca%20ting%20infant%20morality&f=false" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Fransisca Ting.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we talk with Dr. Fransisca Ting about her chapter on infant morality, &quot;Principles and Concepts in Early Moral Cognition&quot;. We specifically discuss whether, in fact, infants are born with moral principles, what those principles might, and whether there is evidence for such a position.</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Ting, F., Dawkins, M. B., Stavans, M., &amp; Baillargeon, R. (2019). Principles and concepts in early moral cognition. The social brain: A developmental perspective, 41-65. <a href="https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=uM7tDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT27&dq=fransisca+ting+infant+morality&ots=oAqGY5yBn3&sig=o8e2SAFu942ZP4wrSwGAtCm80rw#v=onepage&q=fransisca%20ting%20infant%20morality&f=false" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Fransisca Ting.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we talk with Dr. Fransisca Ting about her chapter on infant morality, &quot;Principles and Concepts in Early Moral Cognition&quot;. We specifically discuss whether, in fact, infants are born with moral principles, what those principles might, and whether there is evidence for such a position.</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Ting, F., Dawkins, M. B., Stavans, M., &amp; Baillargeon, R. (2019). Principles and concepts in early moral cognition. The social brain: A developmental perspective, 41-65. <a href="https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=uM7tDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT27&dq=fransisca+ting+infant+morality&ots=oAqGY5yBn3&sig=o8e2SAFu942ZP4wrSwGAtCm80rw#v=onepage&q=fransisca%20ting%20infant%20morality&f=false" rel="nofollow">Link</a></p><p>Special Guest: Fransisca Ting.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+XksRRELd</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+XksRRELd" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://fransiscating.com/" role="guest">Fransisca Ting</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 13: What is a developmental mechanism? What is developmental change?</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/13</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5d9881fb-7a07-4b97-9ca6-2fdb16cf4c40</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 20:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/5d9881fb-7a07-4b97-9ca6-2fdb16cf4c40.mp3" length="100251988" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:51:57</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Do you need a PhD to get a PhD? An odd question, no doubt, but unless you were born yesterday or under a rock, you&#39;ve likely noticed that applicants for PhD programs are becoming increasingly more competitive. For example, whereas in the past it would be uncommon to encounter an applicant with one or more publications, these days this seems to be the rule rather than the exception. We open the episode by talking about this phenomenon and why it might be unhealthy for the field. We also talk about what could be done to fix it.</p>

<p>We then transition to the main segment to talk about a recent paper by Deon, published in Developmental Review, about &quot;developmental mechanisms&quot;. We talk about what they are, about how to study developmental mechanisms, and about what is meant by &quot;developmental change&quot;.</p>

<p>Links</p>

<p>Benton, D. T. (2022). The Elusive “Developmental Mechanism”: What they are and how to study and test them. Developmental Review, 65, 101034. <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273229722000247?casa_token=CzSKTmnatkkAAAAA:kWR_iE_P2tVpdysS6CMy-U-kYMRmq3I18hkYAuvc5wk_g7HCFeRLX0hTfgYXl7lJzJ8XZ1Yf" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>mechanism, developmental mechanism, developmental change, development</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Do you need a PhD to get a PhD? An odd question, no doubt, but unless you were born yesterday or under a rock, you&#39;ve likely noticed that applicants for PhD programs are becoming increasingly more competitive. For example, whereas in the past it would be uncommon to encounter an applicant with one or more publications, these days this seems to be the rule rather than the exception. We open the episode by talking about this phenomenon and why it might be unhealthy for the field. We also talk about what could be done to fix it.</p>

<p>We then transition to the main segment to talk about a recent paper by Deon, published in Developmental Review, about &quot;developmental mechanisms&quot;. We talk about what they are, about how to study developmental mechanisms, and about what is meant by &quot;developmental change&quot;.</p>

<p>Links</p>

<p>Benton, D. T. (2022). The Elusive “Developmental Mechanism”: What they are and how to study and test them. Developmental Review, 65, 101034. <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273229722000247?casa_token=CzSKTmnatkkAAAAA:kWR_iE_P2tVpdysS6CMy-U-kYMRmq3I18hkYAuvc5wk_g7HCFeRLX0hTfgYXl7lJzJ8XZ1Yf" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Do you need a PhD to get a PhD? An odd question, no doubt, but unless you were born yesterday or under a rock, you&#39;ve likely noticed that applicants for PhD programs are becoming increasingly more competitive. For example, whereas in the past it would be uncommon to encounter an applicant with one or more publications, these days this seems to be the rule rather than the exception. We open the episode by talking about this phenomenon and why it might be unhealthy for the field. We also talk about what could be done to fix it.</p>

<p>We then transition to the main segment to talk about a recent paper by Deon, published in Developmental Review, about &quot;developmental mechanisms&quot;. We talk about what they are, about how to study developmental mechanisms, and about what is meant by &quot;developmental change&quot;.</p>

<p>Links</p>

<p>Benton, D. T. (2022). The Elusive “Developmental Mechanism”: What they are and how to study and test them. Developmental Review, 65, 101034. <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273229722000247?casa_token=CzSKTmnatkkAAAAA:kWR_iE_P2tVpdysS6CMy-U-kYMRmq3I18hkYAuvc5wk_g7HCFeRLX0hTfgYXl7lJzJ8XZ1Yf" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+VtLdYLZi</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+VtLdYLZi" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 12: A fresh new look</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/12</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">914ac109-10d1-4e4f-908d-8c3b7898bffe</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 21:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/914ac109-10d1-4e4f-908d-8c3b7898bffe.mp3" length="64152439" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:33:11</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>We are excited to be back! In this episode, Deon introduces new co-host, Jenny Wang. Then Jenny and Deon discuss their origin stories; that is, they discuss how they got to where they are!</p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>origin story, cognitive development</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>We are excited to be back! In this episode, Deon introduces new co-host, Jenny Wang. Then Jenny and Deon discuss their origin stories; that is, they discuss how they got to where they are!</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>We are excited to be back! In this episode, Deon introduces new co-host, Jenny Wang. Then Jenny and Deon discuss their origin stories; that is, they discuss how they got to where they are!</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+Q7m_72qd</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+Q7m_72qd" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 11: Birds of a Feather... Share Saliva?</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/11</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18d18eac-d90e-473a-aa10-80f7081bbb62</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 21:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/18d18eac-d90e-473a-aa10-80f7081bbb62.mp3" length="81211501" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:51:13</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, We chat with Ashley Thomas about her recent paper in the journal Science on whether infants use saliva sharing to infer relationship closeness as well as about some of the more recent controversial papers in Developmental Psychology! </p>

<p>Plus, Deon and Ashley discover—perhaps much to Deon&#39;s chagrin—that their views may be more in common than they are different.</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Thomas, A. J., Woo, B., Nettle, D., Spelke, E., &amp; Saxe, R. (2022). Early concepts of intimacy: Young humans use saliva sharing to infer close relationships. Science, 375(6578), 311-315. [Link to paper](Thomas, A. J., Woo, B., Nettle, D., Spelke, E., &amp; Saxe, R. (2022). Early concepts of intimacy: Young humans use saliva sharing to infer close relationships. Science, 375(6578), 311-315.)</p><p>Special Guest: Ashley Thomas.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>cognitive development</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, We chat with Ashley Thomas about her recent paper in the journal Science on whether infants use saliva sharing to infer relationship closeness as well as about some of the more recent controversial papers in Developmental Psychology! </p>

<p>Plus, Deon and Ashley discover—perhaps much to Deon&#39;s chagrin—that their views may be more in common than they are different.</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Thomas, A. J., Woo, B., Nettle, D., Spelke, E., &amp; Saxe, R. (2022). Early concepts of intimacy: Young humans use saliva sharing to infer close relationships. Science, 375(6578), 311-315. [Link to paper](Thomas, A. J., Woo, B., Nettle, D., Spelke, E., &amp; Saxe, R. (2022). Early concepts of intimacy: Young humans use saliva sharing to infer close relationships. Science, 375(6578), 311-315.)</p><p>Special Guest: Ashley Thomas.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, We chat with Ashley Thomas about her recent paper in the journal Science on whether infants use saliva sharing to infer relationship closeness as well as about some of the more recent controversial papers in Developmental Psychology! </p>

<p>Plus, Deon and Ashley discover—perhaps much to Deon&#39;s chagrin—that their views may be more in common than they are different.</p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Thomas, A. J., Woo, B., Nettle, D., Spelke, E., &amp; Saxe, R. (2022). Early concepts of intimacy: Young humans use saliva sharing to infer close relationships. Science, 375(6578), 311-315. [Link to paper](Thomas, A. J., Woo, B., Nettle, D., Spelke, E., &amp; Saxe, R. (2022). Early concepts of intimacy: Young humans use saliva sharing to infer close relationships. Science, 375(6578), 311-315.)</p><p>Special Guest: Ashley Thomas.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+aEyMmGZk</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+aEyMmGZk" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://www.ashleyjthomas.com/" role="guest">Ashley Thomas</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 5: A positive take on the "positivity bias" (with Janet Boseovski)</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/5</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">b279dee5-7c8a-4d0c-908c-66425618b979</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 23:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/b279dee5-7c8a-4d0c-908c-66425618b979.mp3" length="75311966" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:29:39</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Candy and Deon open the episode by introducing the guest for this episode, Dr. Janet Boseovski, and then discuss life as first-generation academics. Spoiler. It&#39;s difficult, but there may be advantages! In the second half of the episode, Candy and Deon discuss Janet&#39;s work on the &quot;positivty bias&quot; in children, including the mechanism (or mechanisms) that may yield such a bias. In particular, Candy, Janet, and Deon discuss what is meant by &quot;positivity bias&quot; as well as why and how it emerges. </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Boseovski, J. J. (2010). Evidence for “rose‐colored glasses”: An examination of the positivity bias in young children’s personality judgments. Child Development Perspectives, 4(3), 212-218. <a href="https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00149.x?casa_token=dssXlnsMWrEAAAAA:gletw9htnfFXLBpgVtjr_upPa0fKMAXLAw2UIBHKxAfI-c6-MARz1U47gpTj0Fih0ZQpcF6d5yWJRQ" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a> </p>

<p>The music used during intermission was created by David Pizarro of the Very Bad Wizards podcast. The particular sample used is called &quot;Murgatroyd.&quot; </p><p>Special Guest: Janet Boseovski.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>positivity bias, cognitive development</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Candy and Deon open the episode by introducing the guest for this episode, Dr. Janet Boseovski, and then discuss life as first-generation academics. Spoiler. It&#39;s difficult, but there may be advantages! In the second half of the episode, Candy and Deon discuss Janet&#39;s work on the &quot;positivty bias&quot; in children, including the mechanism (or mechanisms) that may yield such a bias. In particular, Candy, Janet, and Deon discuss what is meant by &quot;positivity bias&quot; as well as why and how it emerges. </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Boseovski, J. J. (2010). Evidence for “rose‐colored glasses”: An examination of the positivity bias in young children’s personality judgments. Child Development Perspectives, 4(3), 212-218. <a href="https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00149.x?casa_token=dssXlnsMWrEAAAAA:gletw9htnfFXLBpgVtjr_upPa0fKMAXLAw2UIBHKxAfI-c6-MARz1U47gpTj0Fih0ZQpcF6d5yWJRQ" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a> </p>

<p>The music used during intermission was created by David Pizarro of the Very Bad Wizards podcast. The particular sample used is called &quot;Murgatroyd.&quot; </p><p>Special Guest: Janet Boseovski.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Candy and Deon open the episode by introducing the guest for this episode, Dr. Janet Boseovski, and then discuss life as first-generation academics. Spoiler. It&#39;s difficult, but there may be advantages! In the second half of the episode, Candy and Deon discuss Janet&#39;s work on the &quot;positivty bias&quot; in children, including the mechanism (or mechanisms) that may yield such a bias. In particular, Candy, Janet, and Deon discuss what is meant by &quot;positivity bias&quot; as well as why and how it emerges. </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Boseovski, J. J. (2010). Evidence for “rose‐colored glasses”: An examination of the positivity bias in young children’s personality judgments. Child Development Perspectives, 4(3), 212-218. <a href="https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00149.x?casa_token=dssXlnsMWrEAAAAA:gletw9htnfFXLBpgVtjr_upPa0fKMAXLAw2UIBHKxAfI-c6-MARz1U47gpTj0Fih0ZQpcF6d5yWJRQ" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a> </p>

<p>The music used during intermission was created by David Pizarro of the Very Bad Wizards podcast. The particular sample used is called &quot;Murgatroyd.&quot; </p><p>Special Guest: Janet Boseovski.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+A9HAhMpI</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+A9HAhMpI" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="http://www.duck-lab.com/people/janet-boseovski" role="guest">Janet Boseovski</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 6: Do children theorize about academic performance? (with Melis Muradoğlu)</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/6</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18f375d1-865e-415b-abf5-08a9ebb608b0</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 23:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/18f375d1-865e-415b-abf5-08a9ebb608b0.mp3" length="73769691" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:27:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Candy, Deon, and Melis begin this episode by discussing how they&#39;ve gone about conducting research with children during the pandemic. Then, in the second half of the episode, Melis talks about her work in Child Development that examined children&#39;s developing understanding of academic performance. Specifically, she argues that children consider a person&#39;s effort and intrinsic skill when evaluating and interpreting their performance, which is at odds with a classic view that maintained that children only considere effort when evaluating performance. </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Muradoglu, M., &amp; Cimpian, A. (2020). Children’s Intuitive Theories of Academic Performance. Child development, 91(4), e902-e918. <a href="https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cdev.13325?casa_token=7rL_-S3b0eYAAAAA:WEB8RIA4fE0JA_OG2F6Mx0aY-wlEoCM7LVmliEEdEdmCY2LC1SqstgEpPqfSYo7Q7zNqt402IwP0IQ" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>cognitive development</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Candy, Deon, and Melis begin this episode by discussing how they&#39;ve gone about conducting research with children during the pandemic. Then, in the second half of the episode, Melis talks about her work in Child Development that examined children&#39;s developing understanding of academic performance. Specifically, she argues that children consider a person&#39;s effort and intrinsic skill when evaluating and interpreting their performance, which is at odds with a classic view that maintained that children only considere effort when evaluating performance. </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Muradoglu, M., &amp; Cimpian, A. (2020). Children’s Intuitive Theories of Academic Performance. Child development, 91(4), e902-e918. <a href="https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cdev.13325?casa_token=7rL_-S3b0eYAAAAA:WEB8RIA4fE0JA_OG2F6Mx0aY-wlEoCM7LVmliEEdEdmCY2LC1SqstgEpPqfSYo7Q7zNqt402IwP0IQ" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Candy, Deon, and Melis begin this episode by discussing how they&#39;ve gone about conducting research with children during the pandemic. Then, in the second half of the episode, Melis talks about her work in Child Development that examined children&#39;s developing understanding of academic performance. Specifically, she argues that children consider a person&#39;s effort and intrinsic skill when evaluating and interpreting their performance, which is at odds with a classic view that maintained that children only considere effort when evaluating performance. </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Muradoglu, M., &amp; Cimpian, A. (2020). Children’s Intuitive Theories of Academic Performance. Child development, 91(4), e902-e918. <a href="https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cdev.13325?casa_token=7rL_-S3b0eYAAAAA:WEB8RIA4fE0JA_OG2F6Mx0aY-wlEoCM7LVmliEEdEdmCY2LC1SqstgEpPqfSYo7Q7zNqt402IwP0IQ" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+NnRYKtoC</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+NnRYKtoC" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 4: What's morals got to do with it?</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/4</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">c418f779-64a9-4d89-b6df-21e5cfa7c8bd</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 23:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/c418f779-64a9-4d89-b6df-21e5cfa7c8bd.mp3" length="100648704" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:44:50</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Candy and Deon begin the episode by discussing their respective plans for teaching this fall. Specifically, they discuss whether they&#39;ll be teaching fully in person, fully remotely, or some combination of both. Note that since recording this episode, Deon has decided that he&#39;ll teach fully remotely—in the episode he was leaning toward a hyflex approach. In second segment, Candy and Deon discuss Kiley Hamlin&#39;s classic study on infants&#39; developing sociomoral evaluations as well as a recent replication attempt of the original study by Schlingloff, Csibra, and Tatone (2007). Candy and Deon also discuss whether the data reported in either the original study or replication attempt support the claim that infants possess a &quot;innate moral core&quot; (Hamlin, 2013). And in an episode first Candace and Deon actually disagree about something! Does this spell the end for this nascent podcast? </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., &amp; Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450(7169), 557-559. <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nature06288" rel="nofollow">Link to paper </a><br>
Schlingloff, Csibra, &amp; Tatone, D. (2020). Do 15-month-old infants prefer helpers? A replication of Hamlin et al. (2007). Royal Society Open Science, 7(4), 1-7. <a href="https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsos.191795" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>sociomoral evaluation, cognitive development</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Candy and Deon begin the episode by discussing their respective plans for teaching this fall. Specifically, they discuss whether they&#39;ll be teaching fully in person, fully remotely, or some combination of both. Note that since recording this episode, Deon has decided that he&#39;ll teach fully remotely—in the episode he was leaning toward a hyflex approach. In second segment, Candy and Deon discuss Kiley Hamlin&#39;s classic study on infants&#39; developing sociomoral evaluations as well as a recent replication attempt of the original study by Schlingloff, Csibra, and Tatone (2007). Candy and Deon also discuss whether the data reported in either the original study or replication attempt support the claim that infants possess a &quot;innate moral core&quot; (Hamlin, 2013). And in an episode first Candace and Deon actually disagree about something! Does this spell the end for this nascent podcast? </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., &amp; Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450(7169), 557-559. <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nature06288" rel="nofollow">Link to paper </a><br>
Schlingloff, Csibra, &amp; Tatone, D. (2020). Do 15-month-old infants prefer helpers? A replication of Hamlin et al. (2007). Royal Society Open Science, 7(4), 1-7. <a href="https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsos.191795" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Candy and Deon begin the episode by discussing their respective plans for teaching this fall. Specifically, they discuss whether they&#39;ll be teaching fully in person, fully remotely, or some combination of both. Note that since recording this episode, Deon has decided that he&#39;ll teach fully remotely—in the episode he was leaning toward a hyflex approach. In second segment, Candy and Deon discuss Kiley Hamlin&#39;s classic study on infants&#39; developing sociomoral evaluations as well as a recent replication attempt of the original study by Schlingloff, Csibra, and Tatone (2007). Candy and Deon also discuss whether the data reported in either the original study or replication attempt support the claim that infants possess a &quot;innate moral core&quot; (Hamlin, 2013). And in an episode first Candace and Deon actually disagree about something! Does this spell the end for this nascent podcast? </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., &amp; Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450(7169), 557-559. <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nature06288" rel="nofollow">Link to paper </a><br>
Schlingloff, Csibra, &amp; Tatone, D. (2020). Do 15-month-old infants prefer helpers? A replication of Hamlin et al. (2007). Royal Society Open Science, 7(4), 1-7. <a href="https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsos.191795" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+RBUu5Q3W</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+RBUu5Q3W" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 10: That's just a bunch of nonsense you jive turkey</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/10</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">f3c0a02a-1b06-4873-bb67-af692ccad904</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 23:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/f3c0a02a-1b06-4873-bb67-af692ccad904.mp3" length="67173229" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:15:12</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>After taking a semester-long hiatus, Candy and Deon are back! In this episode, they talk about classic work that examined how infants segment continous speech. Specifically, they discuss a classic paper published in Science by Jenny Saffran, Richard Aslin, and Elisa Newport (1996) (as well as follow-up papers) that examined infants&#39; ability to segment speech by tracking the internal statistics of that speech. This episode is unique and unlike other episodes in that Candy and Deon pick on their own kind this time—empiricists! Hide your natvisists, hide your empiricists—no one&#39;s safe! </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., &amp; Newport, E. L. (1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological science, 9(4), 321-324. <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1467-9280.00063?casa_token=4oDOkWSZ4GUAAAAA:BvHwWlVau1Ek0GTSl6XUefCF-LDiHVyEm5J_gxme-XBFbprSgjDJRLTj060dVCQQvs7NZGYZc3QS" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a> </p>

<p>Pelucchi, B., Hay, J. F., &amp; Saffran, J. R. (2009). Statistical learning in a natural language by 8‐month‐old infants. Child development, 80(3), 674-685. <a href="https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01290.x?casa_token=LrtB4I3jai8AAAAA:yzB1WApSw_6Zobof6VwraHtGqZzMU5Sih4loO4S-PtO23tN2bY9wOiJqZNUeBHRHsky7uwC6X1Ta5g" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a> <br>
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., &amp; Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926-1928. <a href="https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.274.5294.1926" rel="nofollow">Link to paper </a><br>
Slone, L. K., &amp; Johnson, S. P. (2018). When learning goes beyond statistics: Infants represent visual sequences in terms of chunks. Cognition, 178, 92-102. <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027718301367?casa_token=3gs0n72Fvo4AAAAA:HdKKI3uELF8zVCuLDQ3GKhnTUNsStyiL6A8LkKMYje1yRTTOeVxiUP5PwD80QfVUnntuxDny" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>statistical learning, mechanism, cognitive development</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>After taking a semester-long hiatus, Candy and Deon are back! In this episode, they talk about classic work that examined how infants segment continous speech. Specifically, they discuss a classic paper published in Science by Jenny Saffran, Richard Aslin, and Elisa Newport (1996) (as well as follow-up papers) that examined infants&#39; ability to segment speech by tracking the internal statistics of that speech. This episode is unique and unlike other episodes in that Candy and Deon pick on their own kind this time—empiricists! Hide your natvisists, hide your empiricists—no one&#39;s safe! </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., &amp; Newport, E. L. (1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological science, 9(4), 321-324. <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1467-9280.00063?casa_token=4oDOkWSZ4GUAAAAA:BvHwWlVau1Ek0GTSl6XUefCF-LDiHVyEm5J_gxme-XBFbprSgjDJRLTj060dVCQQvs7NZGYZc3QS" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a> </p>

<p>Pelucchi, B., Hay, J. F., &amp; Saffran, J. R. (2009). Statistical learning in a natural language by 8‐month‐old infants. Child development, 80(3), 674-685. <a href="https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01290.x?casa_token=LrtB4I3jai8AAAAA:yzB1WApSw_6Zobof6VwraHtGqZzMU5Sih4loO4S-PtO23tN2bY9wOiJqZNUeBHRHsky7uwC6X1Ta5g" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a> <br>
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., &amp; Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926-1928. <a href="https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.274.5294.1926" rel="nofollow">Link to paper </a><br>
Slone, L. K., &amp; Johnson, S. P. (2018). When learning goes beyond statistics: Infants represent visual sequences in terms of chunks. Cognition, 178, 92-102. <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027718301367?casa_token=3gs0n72Fvo4AAAAA:HdKKI3uELF8zVCuLDQ3GKhnTUNsStyiL6A8LkKMYje1yRTTOeVxiUP5PwD80QfVUnntuxDny" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>After taking a semester-long hiatus, Candy and Deon are back! In this episode, they talk about classic work that examined how infants segment continous speech. Specifically, they discuss a classic paper published in Science by Jenny Saffran, Richard Aslin, and Elisa Newport (1996) (as well as follow-up papers) that examined infants&#39; ability to segment speech by tracking the internal statistics of that speech. This episode is unique and unlike other episodes in that Candy and Deon pick on their own kind this time—empiricists! Hide your natvisists, hide your empiricists—no one&#39;s safe! </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Aslin, R. N., Saffran, J. R., &amp; Newport, E. L. (1998). Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological science, 9(4), 321-324. <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1467-9280.00063?casa_token=4oDOkWSZ4GUAAAAA:BvHwWlVau1Ek0GTSl6XUefCF-LDiHVyEm5J_gxme-XBFbprSgjDJRLTj060dVCQQvs7NZGYZc3QS" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a> </p>

<p>Pelucchi, B., Hay, J. F., &amp; Saffran, J. R. (2009). Statistical learning in a natural language by 8‐month‐old infants. Child development, 80(3), 674-685. <a href="https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01290.x?casa_token=LrtB4I3jai8AAAAA:yzB1WApSw_6Zobof6VwraHtGqZzMU5Sih4loO4S-PtO23tN2bY9wOiJqZNUeBHRHsky7uwC6X1Ta5g" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a> <br>
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., &amp; Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274(5294), 1926-1928. <a href="https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.274.5294.1926" rel="nofollow">Link to paper </a><br>
Slone, L. K., &amp; Johnson, S. P. (2018). When learning goes beyond statistics: Infants represent visual sequences in terms of chunks. Cognition, 178, 92-102. <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027718301367?casa_token=3gs0n72Fvo4AAAAA:HdKKI3uELF8zVCuLDQ3GKhnTUNsStyiL6A8LkKMYje1yRTTOeVxiUP5PwD80QfVUnntuxDny" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+OSJxIMOd</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+OSJxIMOd" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 9: Nothin' but some long-hair, baldheaded faces (with Charisse Pickron)</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/9</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9fbd15d2-187f-45b2-b89c-e6f809448eb5</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 23:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/9fbd15d2-187f-45b2-b89c-e6f809448eb5.mp3" length="93752320" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:51:36</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>This was a fun episode to record with our latest guest, Dr. Charisse Pickron. In the first segment, we talk about politics and, specically, about what a Joe Biden presidency means and what another Donald Trump presidency would mean. Spoiler:We all agree that a second Trump term would be absolutely catastrophic. In the second segment, we talk with Charisse about her work on infant individuation of male and female faces as well as speculate on the processes and mechanisms that support such individuation. </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Pickron, C. B., &amp; Cheries, E. W. (2019). Infants’ Individuation of Faces by Gender. Brain sciences, 9(7), 163. <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/9/7/163" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>face perception, cognitive development</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>This was a fun episode to record with our latest guest, Dr. Charisse Pickron. In the first segment, we talk about politics and, specically, about what a Joe Biden presidency means and what another Donald Trump presidency would mean. Spoiler:We all agree that a second Trump term would be absolutely catastrophic. In the second segment, we talk with Charisse about her work on infant individuation of male and female faces as well as speculate on the processes and mechanisms that support such individuation. </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Pickron, C. B., &amp; Cheries, E. W. (2019). Infants’ Individuation of Faces by Gender. Brain sciences, 9(7), 163. <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/9/7/163" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>This was a fun episode to record with our latest guest, Dr. Charisse Pickron. In the first segment, we talk about politics and, specically, about what a Joe Biden presidency means and what another Donald Trump presidency would mean. Spoiler:We all agree that a second Trump term would be absolutely catastrophic. In the second segment, we talk with Charisse about her work on infant individuation of male and female faces as well as speculate on the processes and mechanisms that support such individuation. </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Pickron, C. B., &amp; Cheries, E. W. (2019). Infants’ Individuation of Faces by Gender. Brain sciences, 9(7), 163. <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/9/7/163" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+YJU2bmo4</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+YJU2bmo4" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 7: Is poking the cat causal? (with Jonathan Kominsky)</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/7</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">0d97acb4-99bf-4f0e-b536-630e4f9ddbd0</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 23:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/0d97acb4-99bf-4f0e-b536-630e4f9ddbd0.mp3" length="97214537" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:55:43</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Candy, Deon, and Jonathan open this episode by talking about #kindscience. For example, should scientist even worry about being kind? What does #kindscience even look like? And is it even possible to be kind to other scientists if your theoretical perspective is at odds with their own? In the second half of the episode, Jonathan talks about his work in Psychological Science on an understudied, but important, aspect of infant causal perception—namely, their sensitivity to certain physical constraints on causal events. Candy, Deon, and Jonathan then go back and forth about whether infants&#39; sensitivity to these constraints is innate and what the mechanism may be that support such sensitivity. </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Kominsky, J. F., Strickland, B., Wertz, A. E., Elsner, C., Wynn, K., &amp; Keil, F. C. (2017). Categories and constraints in causal perception. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1649-1662. <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0956797617719930?casa_token=9_sXGOM8TvgAAAAA:dSh5AK__jBjA6hCZjHMcUM-rkrkGx1fLyoj5rZXtiVUu7EUTewCH8UGDMWRSwZjCCPMDZGTQ3X6V" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p><p>Special Guest: Jonathan Kominsky.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Candy, Deon, and Jonathan open this episode by talking about #kindscience. For example, should scientist even worry about being kind? What does #kindscience even look like? And is it even possible to be kind to other scientists if your theoretical perspective is at odds with their own? In the second half of the episode, Jonathan talks about his work in Psychological Science on an understudied, but important, aspect of infant causal perception—namely, their sensitivity to certain physical constraints on causal events. Candy, Deon, and Jonathan then go back and forth about whether infants&#39; sensitivity to these constraints is innate and what the mechanism may be that support such sensitivity. </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Kominsky, J. F., Strickland, B., Wertz, A. E., Elsner, C., Wynn, K., &amp; Keil, F. C. (2017). Categories and constraints in causal perception. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1649-1662. <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0956797617719930?casa_token=9_sXGOM8TvgAAAAA:dSh5AK__jBjA6hCZjHMcUM-rkrkGx1fLyoj5rZXtiVUu7EUTewCH8UGDMWRSwZjCCPMDZGTQ3X6V" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p><p>Special Guest: Jonathan Kominsky.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Candy, Deon, and Jonathan open this episode by talking about #kindscience. For example, should scientist even worry about being kind? What does #kindscience even look like? And is it even possible to be kind to other scientists if your theoretical perspective is at odds with their own? In the second half of the episode, Jonathan talks about his work in Psychological Science on an understudied, but important, aspect of infant causal perception—namely, their sensitivity to certain physical constraints on causal events. Candy, Deon, and Jonathan then go back and forth about whether infants&#39; sensitivity to these constraints is innate and what the mechanism may be that support such sensitivity. </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Kominsky, J. F., Strickland, B., Wertz, A. E., Elsner, C., Wynn, K., &amp; Keil, F. C. (2017). Categories and constraints in causal perception. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1649-1662. <a href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0956797617719930?casa_token=9_sXGOM8TvgAAAAA:dSh5AK__jBjA6hCZjHMcUM-rkrkGx1fLyoj5rZXtiVUu7EUTewCH8UGDMWRSwZjCCPMDZGTQ3X6V" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p><p>Special Guest: Jonathan Kominsky.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+zhkqHGUG</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+zhkqHGUG" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://www.jfkominsky.com/" role="guest">Jonathan Kominsky</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 3: An Innate Fear of the Term Innate? (with David Rakison)</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/3</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">2e9cd71a-7def-43bd-ba1c-41ececce9900</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 23:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/2e9cd71a-7def-43bd-ba1c-41ececce9900.mp3" length="88476672" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:32:09</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we talk with the esteemed Dr. David Rakison about his research on categorization in older infants and young children. We then ask David to give us his hot take on the term innate and what evidence he&#39;d need to convince him that something is, in fact, innate. We also discuss what the term mechanism really means as well as how to identify one when you see it. We also spend some time talking about how David teaches students to think about mechanism as well as the larger debate between nativists and empiricists. We conclude this episode by having David talk about his upbringing, what got him into psychology in the first place, and what he&#39;d be doing if he weren&#39;t a developmental psychologist. There&#39;s even a brief discussion on the psychology of murder! PS. Deon woud like to apologize for the quality of his audio. He hopes to have this issue fixed by the next episode.</p><p>Special Guest: David Rakison.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>mechanism, cognitive development</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we talk with the esteemed Dr. David Rakison about his research on categorization in older infants and young children. We then ask David to give us his hot take on the term innate and what evidence he&#39;d need to convince him that something is, in fact, innate. We also discuss what the term mechanism really means as well as how to identify one when you see it. We also spend some time talking about how David teaches students to think about mechanism as well as the larger debate between nativists and empiricists. We conclude this episode by having David talk about his upbringing, what got him into psychology in the first place, and what he&#39;d be doing if he weren&#39;t a developmental psychologist. There&#39;s even a brief discussion on the psychology of murder! PS. Deon woud like to apologize for the quality of his audio. He hopes to have this issue fixed by the next episode.</p><p>Special Guest: David Rakison.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, we talk with the esteemed Dr. David Rakison about his research on categorization in older infants and young children. We then ask David to give us his hot take on the term innate and what evidence he&#39;d need to convince him that something is, in fact, innate. We also discuss what the term mechanism really means as well as how to identify one when you see it. We also spend some time talking about how David teaches students to think about mechanism as well as the larger debate between nativists and empiricists. We conclude this episode by having David talk about his upbringing, what got him into psychology in the first place, and what he&#39;d be doing if he weren&#39;t a developmental psychologist. There&#39;s even a brief discussion on the psychology of murder! PS. Deon woud like to apologize for the quality of his audio. He hopes to have this issue fixed by the next episode.</p><p>Special Guest: David Rakison.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+rJDdwrTw</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+rJDdwrTw" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/psychology/infant-cognition-lab/" role="guest">David Rakison</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 8: Don't judge a wagden by its category label (with Lisa Scott)</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/8</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">4ed7f969-92fa-41c5-a759-40bff0fbb190</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 23:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/4ed7f969-92fa-41c5-a759-40bff0fbb190.mp3" length="88478354" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:45:19</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Candy and Deon talk with Lisa Scott about her work on the role of labels on category learning in young infants, in addition to what the mechanism is that enables labels to exert their influence on category acquisition. Plus, we open the episode by discussing student feedback. Do we disregard all feedback? Do we consider some and ignore others? Do we use feedback to improve future courses? We conclude by asking Lisa about her views on innateness as well as whether her research is relevant to the debate between nativists and empiricists. </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Pickron, C. B., Iyer, A., Fava, E., &amp; Scott, L. S. (2018). Learning to individuate: The specificity of labels differentially impacts infant visual attention. Child development, 89(3), 698-710. <a href="https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cdev.13004" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p><p>Special Guest: Lisa Scott.</p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>face perception, cognitive development</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Candy and Deon talk with Lisa Scott about her work on the role of labels on category learning in young infants, in addition to what the mechanism is that enables labels to exert their influence on category acquisition. Plus, we open the episode by discussing student feedback. Do we disregard all feedback? Do we consider some and ignore others? Do we use feedback to improve future courses? We conclude by asking Lisa about her views on innateness as well as whether her research is relevant to the debate between nativists and empiricists. </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Pickron, C. B., Iyer, A., Fava, E., &amp; Scott, L. S. (2018). Learning to individuate: The specificity of labels differentially impacts infant visual attention. Child development, 89(3), 698-710. <a href="https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cdev.13004" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p><p>Special Guest: Lisa Scott.</p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Candy and Deon talk with Lisa Scott about her work on the role of labels on category learning in young infants, in addition to what the mechanism is that enables labels to exert their influence on category acquisition. Plus, we open the episode by discussing student feedback. Do we disregard all feedback? Do we consider some and ignore others? Do we use feedback to improve future courses? We conclude by asking Lisa about her views on innateness as well as whether her research is relevant to the debate between nativists and empiricists. </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Pickron, C. B., Iyer, A., Fava, E., &amp; Scott, L. S. (2018). Learning to individuate: The specificity of labels differentially impacts infant visual attention. Child development, 89(3), 698-710. <a href="https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cdev.13004" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p><p>Special Guest: Lisa Scott.</p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+AturJ1VK</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+AturJ1VK" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="" role="guest">Lisa Scott</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 2: When 1+1 equals more, not 2</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/2</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">167f36d4-6ae3-4348-bd83-441e0cef159f</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 22:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/167f36d4-6ae3-4348-bd83-441e0cef159f.mp3" length="84316032" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:27:49</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>Candy and Deon begin this episode by discussing a recent email exchange between Jonathan Kominsky and Martin Packer about whether studies that use puppets are really testing young children&#39;s theory of mind rather than, for example, their &quot;theory of puppets.&quot; Spoiler: Candy is less optimistic that they are; Deon is much more optimistic that, at the very least, they are approaching the question in the right way . Candy and Deon then discuss a seminal paper by Wynn (1992) that examined 5-month-olds&#39; capacity to add and subtract small numbers. Specifically, they discuss whether the claim &quot;that infants are able to compute the precise results of simple additions and subtractions&quot; (Wynn, 1992, p. 749) is supported by the data. Candy and Deon discuss why they think that the claim is not supported by the data and then go on to discuss some mixed evidence for this claim from follow-up replication attempts. </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Cohen, L.B., &amp; Marks, K.S. (2002). How infants process addition and subtraction events. Developmental Science, 5(2), 186-201. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-7687.00220?casa_token=wuzQ1nJKEiAAAAAA:rnnXBlspfWDFGhXVjPi4lUv09inCMcNqy0_7sH-2stwGdS2OSEvs6HxmRsoT1s6yj2F3mzj9rMPNRQ" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a> <br>
Simon, T.J., Hespos, S.J., &amp; Rochat, P. (1995). Do Infants Understand Simple Arithmetic? A Replication of Wynn (1992). Cognitive Development, 10, 253-269. <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/088520149590011X" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a> <br>
Wynn, K. (1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature. 358, 749-750. <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/358749a0" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <itunes:keywords>infant math, cognitive development, methods</itunes:keywords>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>Candy and Deon begin this episode by discussing a recent email exchange between Jonathan Kominsky and Martin Packer about whether studies that use puppets are really testing young children&#39;s theory of mind rather than, for example, their &quot;theory of puppets.&quot; Spoiler: Candy is less optimistic that they are; Deon is much more optimistic that, at the very least, they are approaching the question in the right way . Candy and Deon then discuss a seminal paper by Wynn (1992) that examined 5-month-olds&#39; capacity to add and subtract small numbers. Specifically, they discuss whether the claim &quot;that infants are able to compute the precise results of simple additions and subtractions&quot; (Wynn, 1992, p. 749) is supported by the data. Candy and Deon discuss why they think that the claim is not supported by the data and then go on to discuss some mixed evidence for this claim from follow-up replication attempts. </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Cohen, L.B., &amp; Marks, K.S. (2002). How infants process addition and subtraction events. Developmental Science, 5(2), 186-201. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-7687.00220?casa_token=wuzQ1nJKEiAAAAAA:rnnXBlspfWDFGhXVjPi4lUv09inCMcNqy0_7sH-2stwGdS2OSEvs6HxmRsoT1s6yj2F3mzj9rMPNRQ" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a> <br>
Simon, T.J., Hespos, S.J., &amp; Rochat, P. (1995). Do Infants Understand Simple Arithmetic? A Replication of Wynn (1992). Cognitive Development, 10, 253-269. <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/088520149590011X" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a> <br>
Wynn, K. (1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature. 358, 749-750. <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/358749a0" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>Candy and Deon begin this episode by discussing a recent email exchange between Jonathan Kominsky and Martin Packer about whether studies that use puppets are really testing young children&#39;s theory of mind rather than, for example, their &quot;theory of puppets.&quot; Spoiler: Candy is less optimistic that they are; Deon is much more optimistic that, at the very least, they are approaching the question in the right way . Candy and Deon then discuss a seminal paper by Wynn (1992) that examined 5-month-olds&#39; capacity to add and subtract small numbers. Specifically, they discuss whether the claim &quot;that infants are able to compute the precise results of simple additions and subtractions&quot; (Wynn, 1992, p. 749) is supported by the data. Candy and Deon discuss why they think that the claim is not supported by the data and then go on to discuss some mixed evidence for this claim from follow-up replication attempts. </p>

<p>Links </p>

<p>Cohen, L.B., &amp; Marks, K.S. (2002). How infants process addition and subtraction events. Developmental Science, 5(2), 186-201. <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1467-7687.00220?casa_token=wuzQ1nJKEiAAAAAA:rnnXBlspfWDFGhXVjPi4lUv09inCMcNqy0_7sH-2stwGdS2OSEvs6HxmRsoT1s6yj2F3mzj9rMPNRQ" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a> <br>
Simon, T.J., Hespos, S.J., &amp; Rochat, P. (1995). Do Infants Understand Simple Arithmetic? A Replication of Wynn (1992). Cognitive Development, 10, 253-269. <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/088520149590011X" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a> <br>
Wynn, K. (1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature. 358, 749-750. <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/358749a0" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+drJta_QY</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+drJta_QY" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Episode 1: Mechanisms all the way down</title>
      <link>https://itsinnate.fireside.fm/1</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9b20ae62-a873-44f3-93a9-b985fe100f18</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 20:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
      <author>theitsinnatepodcast@gmail.com (Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang)</author>
      <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/9b20ae62-a873-44f3-93a9-b985fe100f18.mp3" length="43594231" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
      <itunes:author>Deon Benton &amp; Jenny Wang</itunes:author>
      <itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
      <itunes:duration>1:39:55</itunes:duration>
      <itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
      <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/e/e7d55467-26ad-4d13-aa3b-ffe8a883b0bb/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p>During the first half of their very first episode, Candy and Deon introduce themselves, discuss why they chose to start this podcast, and share why they&#39;d even dare to name their show the It&#39;s Innate! podcast given the longstanding and often contentious debate in the developmental literature surrounding this term. During the second half of the episode, Candy and Deon discuss Candy&#39;s research with young children. This research examined the role of social comparison on children&#39;s self-evaluations. Spoiler alert: It turns out that, to everyone&#39;s absolute surprise, children very much dislike being outperformed by novices. Following this discussion, Candy and Deon turn their attention to Deon&#39;s recent work in which he examined how a novel mechanism, called second-order correlation learning, might support young children&#39;s causal inferences. Candy and Deon conclude by discussing how second-order correlation learning can be leveraged to support children&#39;s developing theory of mind, on the one hand, and to mitigate possible racial bias in children, on the other hand. <br>
Links </p>

<p>Benton, D. T., Rakison, D. H., &amp; Sobel, D. M. (2021). When correlation equals causation: A behavioral and computational account of second-order correlation learning in children. <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022096520304628" rel="nofollow">Link to paper </a><br>
Lapan, C., &amp; Boseovski, J. J. (2017). When peer performance matters: Effects of expertise and traits on children&#39;s self‐evaluations after social comparison. Child development, 88(6), 1860-1872. <a href="https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cdev.12941" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
      </description>
      <content:encoded>
        <![CDATA[<p>During the first half of their very first episode, Candy and Deon introduce themselves, discuss why they chose to start this podcast, and share why they&#39;d even dare to name their show the It&#39;s Innate! podcast given the longstanding and often contentious debate in the developmental literature surrounding this term. During the second half of the episode, Candy and Deon discuss Candy&#39;s research with young children. This research examined the role of social comparison on children&#39;s self-evaluations. Spoiler alert: It turns out that, to everyone&#39;s absolute surprise, children very much dislike being outperformed by novices. Following this discussion, Candy and Deon turn their attention to Deon&#39;s recent work in which he examined how a novel mechanism, called second-order correlation learning, might support young children&#39;s causal inferences. Candy and Deon conclude by discussing how second-order correlation learning can be leveraged to support children&#39;s developing theory of mind, on the one hand, and to mitigate possible racial bias in children, on the other hand. <br>
Links </p>

<p>Benton, D. T., Rakison, D. H., &amp; Sobel, D. M. (2021). When correlation equals causation: A behavioral and computational account of second-order correlation learning in children. <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022096520304628" rel="nofollow">Link to paper </a><br>
Lapan, C., &amp; Boseovski, J. J. (2017). When peer performance matters: Effects of expertise and traits on children&#39;s self‐evaluations after social comparison. Child development, 88(6), 1860-1872. <a href="https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cdev.12941" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
      </content:encoded>
      <itunes:summary>
        <![CDATA[<p>During the first half of their very first episode, Candy and Deon introduce themselves, discuss why they chose to start this podcast, and share why they&#39;d even dare to name their show the It&#39;s Innate! podcast given the longstanding and often contentious debate in the developmental literature surrounding this term. During the second half of the episode, Candy and Deon discuss Candy&#39;s research with young children. This research examined the role of social comparison on children&#39;s self-evaluations. Spoiler alert: It turns out that, to everyone&#39;s absolute surprise, children very much dislike being outperformed by novices. Following this discussion, Candy and Deon turn their attention to Deon&#39;s recent work in which he examined how a novel mechanism, called second-order correlation learning, might support young children&#39;s causal inferences. Candy and Deon conclude by discussing how second-order correlation learning can be leveraged to support children&#39;s developing theory of mind, on the one hand, and to mitigate possible racial bias in children, on the other hand. <br>
Links </p>

<p>Benton, D. T., Rakison, D. H., &amp; Sobel, D. M. (2021). When correlation equals causation: A behavioral and computational account of second-order correlation learning in children. <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022096520304628" rel="nofollow">Link to paper </a><br>
Lapan, C., &amp; Boseovski, J. J. (2017). When peer performance matters: Effects of expertise and traits on children&#39;s self‐evaluations after social comparison. Child development, 88(6), 1860-1872. <a href="https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cdev.12941" rel="nofollow">Link to paper</a></p>]]>
      </itunes:summary>
      <fireside:playerURL>https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+yEzHOCsD</fireside:playerURL>
      <fireside:playerEmbedCode>
        <![CDATA[<iframe src="https://fireside.fm/player/v2/R8yhKeXn+yEzHOCsD" width="740" height="200" frameborder="0" scrolling="no">]]>
      </fireside:playerEmbedCode>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://sites.rutgers.edu/jinjing-jenny-wang/" role="host">Jenny Wang</podcast:person>
      <podcast:person email="" href="https://theccdlab.com/" role="host">Deon T. Benton</podcast:person>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
